Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
British Journal of Ophthalmology 1997;81:907-910; doi:10.1136/bjo.81.10.907
Copyright © 1997 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:907-910 ( October )

Phacoemulsification versus extracapsular cataract extraction: a comparative study of cell survival and growth on the human capsular bag in vitro

M Quinlan,* a I M Wormstone,b G Duncan,b P D Daviesa

a West Norwich Hospital, Norwich, b School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ

Correspondence to: George Duncan.

Accepted for publication 23 July 1997

AIMS/BACKGROUND---Phacoemulsification is rapidly replacing conventional extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) as the method of choice for cataract surgery in the Western world. However, posterior capsule opacification (PCO) still remains the major postoperative complication, affecting 20-50% of patients, and results from persistent cell growth of epithelial cells remaining after surgery. This study aimed to compare cell survival and growth on capsular bags following ECCE and phacoemulsification surgery using an established human capsular bag culture system.
METHODS---Sham ECCE and phacoemulsification cataract operations were performed on pairs of human donor eyes. Capsular bags were dissected free, pinned flat on a petri dish, and incubated with Eagle's minimum essential medium (EMEM) alone or EMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). Ongoing observations were made using phase contrast microscopy.
RESULTS---Cell growth was observed across the posterior capsule of all preparations studied. It was found that there was no significant difference in the rate of cell growth on the posterior capsule with the two extraction methods, such that 50% confluency was achieved in 7.0 (SD 1.8) (n=7) days for ECCE and 7.43 (2.1) (n=7) days for phacoemulsification surgery. The physical changes to the capsule as a result of cell growth, such as wrinkling and capsular tensioning, were also seen in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS---Cell survival and growth is dependent on the donor, rather than the surgical technique performed. There is no significant difference between phacoemulsification and ECCE surgery on the rate and nature of cell growth on the posterior capsule in vitro.


* Present address: Department of Ophthalmology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge


© 1997 by British Journal of Ophthalmology

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Gotoh, N., Perdue, N. R., Matsushima, H., Sage, E. H., Yan, Q., Clark, J. I. (2007). An In Vitro Model of Posterior Capsular Opacity: SPARC and TGF-{beta}2 Minimize Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Lens Epithelium. IOVS 48: 4679-4687 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • DUNCAN, G. (1998). Lens cell growth and posterior capsule opacification: in vivo and in vitro observations. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 82: 1102-1103 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Ophthalmology Jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs