Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
British Journal of Ophthalmology 1997;81:214-217; doi:10.1136/bjo.81.3.214
Copyright © 1997 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:214-217 ( March )

Diabetic retinopathy in people aged 70 years or older. The Oulu Eye Study

Heli Hirvelä, Leila Laatikainen*

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

Correspondence to: Heli Hirvelä, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Oulu, 90220 Oulu, Finland.

Accepted for publication 8 October 1996

AIMS---To evaluate the presence and severity of diabetic retinopathy and the value of retinopathy screening in people aged 70 years or older.
METHODS---In a population based study on 500 of 560 eligible (89%) people aged 70 years or older, signs of diabetic retinopathy were evaluated through dilated pupils by an ophthalmologist using photographic and/or ophthalmoscopic methods.
RESULTS---23% of the study population (113/500) had diabetes mellitus. Signs of diabetic retinopathy were found in 24 people (21% of the diabetic population). Retinopathy changes were graded as mild to moderate non-proliferative retinopathy (NPDR) in 40 eyes (18 people), severe NPDR (preproliferative) in five eyes (four people), and proliferative in three eyes (two people). Preproliferative or proliferative changes were present in four people (3.5% of the diabetic population) and diabetic maculopathy was diagnosed in nine (8% of the diabetic population). Laser treatment was considered to be indicated in seven people for maculopathy, and in two for proliferative changes. In four people the visual acuity was reduced to a low vision level as a result of diabetic retinopathy.
CONCLUSION---In spite of the high prevalence of diabetes mellitus in the elderly population, the prevalence of vision threatening diabetic retinopathy, particularly proliferative retinopathy, is low. Ophthalmoscopically, reliable information on fundus changes could be obtained in 94%, but photographs were gradable in only 76% of the diabetic population. Therefore, the value of photographic screening for diabetic retinopathy in this age group is poor in comparison with younger age groups.


* Present address: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.


© 1997 by British Journal of Ophthalmology

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • HORNICK, T., ARON, D. C. (2008). Preventing and managing diabetic complications in elderly patients. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 75: 153-158 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brown, A. F., Jiang, L., Fong, D. S., Gutierrez, P. R., Coleman, A. L., Lee, P. P., Adams, J., Mangione, C. M. (2005). Need for Eye Care Among Older Adults With Diabetes Mellitus in Fee-for-Service and Managed Medicare. Arch Ophthalmol 123: 669-675 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lee, P. P., Feldman, Z. W., Ostermann, J., Brown, D. S., Sloan, F. A. (2003). Longitudinal Prevalence of Major Eye Diseases. Arch Ophthalmol 121: 1303-1310 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Ophthalmology Jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs