Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
British Journal of Ophthalmology 1999;83:295-298; doi:10.1136/bjo.83.3.295
Copyright © 1999 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:295-298 ( March )

Comparison between laser scanning tomography and computerised image analysis of the optic disc

Augusto Azuara-Blanco,a b George L Spaeth,b Jamie Nicholl,b Ines M Lanzl,b James J Augsburgerc

a Department of Ophthalmology Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, b Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, USA, c Retina Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Correspondence to: Augusto Azuara-Blanco, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, B-Floor, South Block, Queen's Medical Centre, University Hospital, Nottingham NG7 2UH.

Accepted for publication 22 September 1998

AIMS---To study the interchangeability of the measurements of the optic disc topography obtained by one computerised image analyser and one confocal laser tomographic scanner.
METHODS---One eye of 28 patients with glaucoma or glaucoma suspects was studied. All cases had simultaneous stereoscopic disc photographs taken with the fundus camera Topcon TRC-SS and optic disc examination with the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) during the same visit. The optic disc photographs were digitised and analysed with the Topcon ImageNet (TI) system. Three variables of the optic disc topography provided by the TI and the HRT were compared---cup volume (CV), rim area (RA), and cup area to disc area ratio (CA/DA).
RESULTS---The mean values of CV and RA provided by the TI (0.52 (SD 0.32) mm3 and 1.58 (0.39) mm2, respectively) were greater (p<0.01) than the mean values of CV and RA determined by the HRT (0.32 (0.25) mm3, and 1.33 (0.47) mm2, respectively). The mean value of CA/DA provided by the TI (0.42 (0.14)) and the HRT (0.42 (0.18)) was similar (p=0.93). Correlation coefficients between measurements obtained by the two methods ranged from 0.53 to 0.73.
CONCLUSION---There was a significant discrepancy in the measurements of rim area and cup volume of the optic disc obtained by a computerised image analyser and a laser scanning tomograph.

Keywords: optic disc; glaucoma; image analysis


© 1999 by British Journal of Ophthalmology

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Ophthalmology Jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs