Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2001;85:291-296; doi:10.1136/bjo.85.3.291
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:291-296 ( March )

Distant cancer effects on standardised testing of peripheral vision

William W Dawsona, Berry L Jordana, Robert D Marshb, Kaushik Hazariwalaa, Franklin P Flowersc, Ting Fanga

a Department of Ophthalmology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA, b Department of Oncology, Division of Dermatology, c College of Medicine

Correspondence to: William W Dawson, MS, PhD, Department of Ophthalmology, Box 100284, Health Science Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0284, USA wdawson{at}eye1.eye.ufl.edu

Accepted for publication 1 September 2000

BACKGROUND---Profound central-retinal visual losses have been a major presenting factor reported in cancer and melanoma associated retinopathies (CAR, MAR). However, it is well established that standardised tests of peripheral retinal function are often the most sensitive detectors of early eye disease. This is a preliminary investigation of the responsiveness of the peripheral retina to "distant" (non-eye or CNS) cancers using easily obtained standardised tests.
METHODS---The design is a single blind study where test results are compared with published norms and a small age matched control group. Of 120 ambulatory cancer outpatients who were interviewed at routine follow up examinations, 111 volunteered and admitted a range of mild visual changes. 25 cancer patients completed all tests of peripheral vision function and a clinical screening. There were seven control subjects of the same age range.
RESULTS---98% (49 of 50) of eyes from the patient cohort were judged clinically normal following examinations which emphasised the central retina, fundus appearance, and static fields. On testing which emphasised the visual periphery, 46 (92%) eyes showed one or more quantitative abnormalities >2 SD from the age adjusted norm means. These abnormalities clustered mainly about dark adaptation (rod cell) sensitivity (31, 62% of measured sites), the blue sensitive retinal cells (17, 34% of measured eyes), and the oscillatory component (OP) of the electroretinogram (23, 46% of measured eyes). One control eye (7%) showed a significant dark adaptation abnormality and ERG reduction. There was no identifiable interaction between chemotherapy mode and the cancer associated retinal deficits (CARD). Antiretinal antibodies were found in sera from most patients and controls.
CONCLUSION---CARD is common in the retinal periphery of many cancer patients, and is distinct from rare CAR, MAR central-retinal responses. CARD has numerous potential clinical uses which justify expanded research with more defined large samples.


© 2001 by British Journal of Ophthalmology

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Ophthalmology Jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs