SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE

Low vision services for vision rehabilitation in the United Kingdom

L E Culham^1,2, B Ryan³, A J Jackson⁴, A R Hill⁵, B Jones⁶, C Miles¹, J A Young⁷, C Bunce² and A C Bird^1,2

¹ Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
² Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
³ The Royal National Institute for the Blind, London, UK
⁴ The Royal Victoria Hospital/Queens University, Belfast, University of Ulster, UK
⁵ Oxford Eye Hospital/Oxford University, Oxford, UK
⁶ Independent service user
⁷ Edinburgh College of Art/Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Louise Culham, Moorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UK;
louise.culham{at}moorfields.nhs.uk

Aim: Little is known about the distribution and methods of delivery of low vision services across the United Kingdom. The purpose of this study was to determine the type and location of low vision services within the UK.

Methods: Survey by means of a 29 point postal questionnaire, followed when necessary by a five point telephone questionnaire. All known potential providers of low vision services (n = 2539) including hospitals (n = 277), optician/optometry practices (n = 1683), social services (n = 177), voluntary groups (n = 190), specialist teachers (n = 205), and universities (n = 6) were surveyed. For each service provider, the type, magnitude, and geographical location were determined. The distribution of services across the United Kingdom and the ratio of providers to population density of people with a visual impairment were mapped using the Geographic Information System (GIS).

Results: Data were obtained on 1945 (77%) service providers: 1679 (66%) responded to the postal questionnaire and 266 (11%) to the telephone questionnaire. Of all respondents, 59% (n = 1135) offer some form of help to people with a visual disability, of which 26% (n = 497) only sell magnifiers and 33% (n = 638) provide low vision services. It is estimated that in total just under 155 000 low vision consultations are offered annually, the bulk of which are provided by hospital eye departments. The distribution was geographically uneven and there appears to be scarcity in some areas.

Conclusion: When compared to the probable number of people with a visual impairment in the UK there are apparent inadequacies in service provision in terms of distribution, magnitude, and coordination. The results highlight a need to review current services.

Keywords: low vision service provision; rehabilitation; visual impairment

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

BJO at a glance

Creig Hoyt
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002 86: 709. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Shah, S. P., Minto, H., Jadoon, M. Z., Bourne, R. R. A., Dineen, B., Gilbert, C. E., Khan, M. D., on behalf of the Pakistan National Eye Survey Stud, (2008). Prevalence and Causes of Functional Low Vision and Implications for Services: The Pakistan National Blindness and Visual Impairment Survey. IOVS 49: 887-893 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hassell, J B, Lamoureux, E L, Keeffe, J E (2006). Impact of age related macular degeneration on quality of life. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 90: 593-596 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Reeves, B C, Harper, R A, Russell, W B (2004). Enhanced low vision rehabilitation for people with age related macular degeneration: a randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 88: 1443-1449 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hinds, A, Sinclair, A, Park, J, Suttie, A, Paterson, H, Macdonald, M (2003). Impact of an interdisciplinary low vision service on the quality of life of low vision patients. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 87: 1391-1396 [Abstract] [Full Text]