Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2002;86:1035-1040; doi:10.1136/bjo.86.9.1035
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2002;86:1035-1040
© 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology

CLINICAL SCIENCE

Emmetropisation following preterm birth

K J Saunders1, D L McCulloch2, A J Shepherd3 and A G Wilkinson4

1 School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, BT52 1SA, UK
2 Department of Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
3 Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK
4 Department of Radiology, The Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr K J Saunders, School of Biomedical Science, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, BT52 1SA;
kj.saunders{at}ulst.ac.uk

Background/aims: Even in the absence of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), premature birth signals increased risk for abnormal refractive development. The present study examined the relation between clinical risk factors and refractive development among preterm infants without ROP.

Methods: Cycloplegic refraction was measured at birth, term, 6, 12, and 48 months corrected age in a cohort of 59 preterm infants. Detailed perinatal history and cranial ultrasound data were collected. 40 full term (plus or minus 2 weeks) subjects were tested at birth, 6, and 12 months old.

Results: Myopia and anisometropia were associated with prematurity (p<0.05). More variation in astigmatic axis was found among preterm infants (p<0.05) and a trend for more astigmatism (p<0.1). Emmetropisation occurred in the preterm infants so that at term age they did not differ from the fullterm group in astigmatism or anisometropia. However, preterm infants remained more myopic (less hyperopic) than the fullterm group at term (p<0.05) and those infants born <1500 g remained more anisometropic than their peers until 6 months (p<0.05). Infants with abnormal cranial ultrasound were at risk for higher hyperopia (p<0.05). Other clinical risk factors were not associated with differences in refractive development. At 4 years of age 19% of the preterm group had clinically significant refractive errors.

Conclusion: Preterm infants without ROP had high rates of refractive error. The early emmetropisation process differed from that of the fullterm group but neither clinical risk factors nor measures of early refractive error were predictive of refractive outcome at 4 years.

Keywords: prematurity; refraction; emmetropisation; infants


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Mills, M. D., Quinn, G. E., Grunwald, J. E., Ying, G.-S., Karp, K., Rabinowitz, M. (2008). Retinal Vessels and Retinopathy of Prematurity--Reply. Arch Ophthalmol 126: 869-870 [Full Text]  
  • Huynh, S C, Wang, X Y, Ip, J, Robaei, D, Kifley, A, Rose, K A, Mitchell, P (2006). Prevalence and associations of anisometropia and aniso-astigmatism in a population based sample of 6 year old children. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 90: 597-601 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • O'Connor, A R, Stephenson, T J, Johnson, A, Tobin, M J, Ratib, S, Fielder, A R (2006). Change of refractive state and eye size in children of birth weight less than 1701 g.. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 90: 456-460 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • (2003). Lucina. Arch. Dis. Child. 88: 368-368 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Ophthalmology Jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs