Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2003;87:1492-1496; doi:10.1136/bjo.87.12.1492
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2003;87:1492-1496
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

EXTENDED REPORT

Intraocular pressure after replacement of current dual therapy with latanoprost monotherapy in patients with open angle glaucoma

L E Pillunat1 and L-I Larsson2 and the European and Canadian Latanoprost Study Group*

1 Department of Ophthalmology, Augenklinik der Techn, Universität Dresden, Germany
2 Department of Ophthalmology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Lutz Pillunat
Universitäts Augenklinik, Fetscherstrasse, D-01307 Dresden, Germany; direction{at}uniklinikum-dresden.de

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of replacing current dual ocular hypotensive therapy with latanoprost 0.005% monotherapy in patients with open angle glaucoma.

Methods: This randomised, open label, parallel group, multinational study included 466 patients with open angle glaucoma currently on dual ocular hypotensive therapy, including a ß adrenergic receptor antagonist. Patients were assigned (1:3) to ongoing dual therapy or a switch to monotherapy with latanoprost 0.005% once daily for 6 months. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured at 10 am and 5 pm at baseline, month 3, and month 6. Groups were compared for differences in diurnal IOP change, IOP success rates (IOP <=22 mm Hg with <=15% increase from baseline), and clinical success rates (not requiring change in therapy).

Results: Baseline mean diurnal IOP was 17.8 (SD 2.0) mm Hg in the latanoprost group and 17.6 (2.1) mm Hg in the dual therapy group. After 6 months, mean diurnal IOP was reduced by 0.26 (0.18) (SEM 1.4%) mm Hg (p = 0.153) in the group switched to latanoprost and by 0.37 (0.25) (2.1%) mm Hg (p = 0.138) in those continuing dual therapy (difference: 0.11 mm Hg; p = 0.641). Success rates defined by IOP criteria were 83% for latanoprost and 89% for continued dual therapy (difference: 6%; p = 0.122). Clinical success rates were 97% for latanoprost and 99% for dual therapy (difference: 2%; p = 0.161). Ocular adverse events were reported by 23% of patients in both treatment groups.

Conclusion: Latanoprost monotherapy is a safe and effective alternative for many patients with open angle glaucoma requiring dual topical ocular hypotensive therapy for IOP control.

Keywords: intraocular pressure; latanoprost; open angle gluacoma


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Ophthalmology Jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs