SINGAPORE SERI-ARVO MEETING

Ocular biometry in occludable angles and angle closure glaucoma: a population based survey

R George¹, P G Paul¹, M Baskaran¹, S Ve Ramesh¹, P Raju¹, H Arvind¹, C McCarty² and L Vijaya¹

¹ Glaucoma Project, Vision Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India
² Marshfield Medical Research Foundation, WI, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Lingam Vijaya, Medical and Vision Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, 18 College Road, Chennai, India - 600 006;
chennaigs{at}rediffmail.com

Aim: To compare ocular biometric values in a population based sample of eyes with occludable angles, angle closure glaucoma, and normal subjects.

Method: 2850 subjects from a population based glaucoma prevalence study underwent complete ocular examination including indentation gonioscopy. Ocular biometry was performed in all subjects classified to have occludable angles (n = 143); angle closure glaucoma (n = 22), and a random subgroup of 419 normal subjects. Ocular biometry readings between the groups were compared and statistically analysed using "t," "z," and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results: The mean age among subjects with occludable angles (54.43 (SD 9.53) years) and angle closure glaucoma (57.45 (8.5) years) was significantly higher (p<0.001) than normal subjects (49.95 (9.95) years). Axial length was shorter (p<0.001) in the occludable angle group (22.07 (0.69) mm) compared to the normal group (22.76 (0.78) mm). Anterior chamber depth (ACD) was shallower (p<0.001) among subjects with occludable angles (2.53 (0.26) mm) than normal subjects (3.00 (0.30) mm). Lens thickness (LT) was greater (p<0.001) in people with occludable angles (4.40 (0.53) mm) compared to normal subjects (4.31 (0.31) mm). No significant difference was noted in axial length, ACD (p = 0.451), and LT (p = 0.302) between angle closure glaucoma and occludable eyes.

Conclusion: South Indian eyes with angle closure glaucoma and occludable angles seem to have significantly shorter axial lengths, shallower anterior chambers and greater lens thickness compared to the normal group.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Amerasinghe, N., Foster, P. J., Wong, T. Y., Htoon, H. M., He, M., Shen, S. Y., Aung, H. T., Saw, S.-M., Aung, T. (2009). Variation of Angle Parameters in Asians: An Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Study in a Population of Singapore Malays. IOVS 50: 2626-2631 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lavanya, R., Wong, T.-Y., Friedman, D. S., Aung, H. T., Alfred, T., Gao, H., Seah, S. K., Kashiwagi, K., Foster, P. J., Aung, T. (2008). Determinants of Angle Closure in Older Singaporeans. Arch Ophthalmol 126: 686-691 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Vijaya, L., George, R., Arvind, H., Baskaran, M., Paul, P. G., Ramesh, S. V., Raju, P., Kumaramanickavel, G., McCarty, C. (2006). Prevalence of angle-closure disease in a rural southern Indian population.. Arch Ophthalmol 124: 403-409 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Nolan, W (2006). Lens extraction in primary angle closure. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 90: 1-2 [Full Text]  
• Raju, P., Ve Ramesh, S., Arvind, H., George, R., Baskaran, M., Paul, P. G., Kumaramanickavel, G., McCarty, C., Vijaya, L. (2004). Prevalence of Refractive Errors in a Rural South Indian Population. IOVS 45: 4268-4272 [Abstract] [Full Text]