© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group
EXTENDED REPORT
A phase III, placebo controlled clinical trial of 0.5% levofloxacin ophthalmic solution for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis
1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
2 Shiley Eye Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
3 Charlotte Eye Ear Nose and Throat Associates, Charlotte, NC, USA
4 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
5 Department of Ophthalmology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
David G Hwang, MD, Cornea and Refractive Surgery Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, 10 Koret Way, San Francisco, CA 941430730, USA;
dghwang{at}itsa.ucsf.edu
Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution (Quixin) with placebo for treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.
Methods: In this prospective, randomised, placebo controlled, double masked, multicentre study, 249 patients with bacterial conjunctivitis received either 0.5% levofloxacin (n = 126) or placebo (n = 123) for 5 days, administered every 2 hours on days 12, then every 4 hours on days 35. Cultures were obtained and signs/symptoms evaluated at baseline, interim, and final visits. The end point was the last evaluable observation. Primary microbial outcomes were based on culture results; clinical outcomes were based on resolution of cardinal signs.
Results: 117 patients (60 levofloxacin, 57 placebo) were evaluated. Microbial eradication rates were significantly greater with levofloxacin at all time points, reaching 90% at end point. In a subgroup analysis, differences in eradication rates at end point were most pronounced in children but were also statistically significant for levofloxacin in adults. Clinical cure rates were significantly greater with levofloxacin at final visit and end point. Statistically significant differences favouring levofloxacin were measured at end point for resolution of conjunctival discharge, bulbar conjunctival injection, palpebral conjunctival injection, burning/stinging, itching, and photophobia. Adverse events were similar between groups. Safety composite scores analysed by age indicated significantly fewer children on levofloxacin experienced worsening symptoms.
Conclusions: Levofloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution is safe and effective for treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.
Keywords: bacterial conjunctivitis; levofloxacin; fluoroquinolone, Quixin
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Ferrer, C, Rodriguez, A, Abad, J L, Fernandez, J, Alio, J L
(2008). Bactericidal effect of intravitreal levofloxacin in an experimental model of endophthalmitis. Br. J. Ophthalmol.
92: 678-682
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Cantor, L B, WuDunn, D, Yung, C W, Valluri, S, Catoira, Y P, Hoop, J S, Morgan, L S
(2008). Ocular penetration of levofloxacin, ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in eyes with functioning filtering blebs: investigator masked, randomised clinical trial. Br. J. Ophthalmol.
92: 345-347
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Protzko, E., Bowman, L., Abelson, M., Shapiro, A., for the AzaSite Clinical Study Group,
(2007). Phase 3 Safety Comparisons for 1.0% Azithromycin in Polymeric Mucoadhesive Eye Drops versus 0.3% Tobramycin Eye Drops for Bacterial Conjunctivitis. IOVS
48: 3425-3429
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Ta, C. N.
(2007). Topical Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Intraocular Injections. Arch Ophthalmol
125: 972-974
[Full Text] -
Cochereau, I., Meddeb-Ouertani, A., Khairallah, M., Amraoui, A., Zaghloul, K., Pop, M., Delval, L., Pouliquen, P., Tandon, R., Garg, P., Goldschmidt, P., Bourcier, T.
(2007). 3-day treatment with azithromycin 1.5% eye drops versus 7-day treatment with tobramycin 0.3% for purulent bacterial conjunctivitis: multicentre, randomised and controlled trial in adults and children. Br. J. Ophthalmol.
91: 465-469
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Elizabeth Harkless, G.
(2006). Topical chloramphenicol was not effective for acute infective conjunctivitis in children. Evid. Based Nurs.
9: 12-12
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
