Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2003;87:960-963; doi:10.1136/bjo.87.8.960
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2003;87:960-963
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group

SCIENTIFIC REPORT

IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases

H Eleftheriadis

Southend General Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Prittlewell Chase, Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex, SS0 0RY, UK; H.Eleftheriadis{at}btinternet.com

ABSTRACT

Aims: To study the refractive outcome of cataract surgery employing IOLMaster biometry data and to compare it with that of applanation ultrasonography in a prospective study of 100 eyes that underwent phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation.

Methods: The Holladay formula using IOLMaster data was employed for the prediction of implanted intraocular lenses (IOLs). One month after cataract surgery the refractive outcome was determined. Preoperative applanation ultrasonography data were used retrospectively to calculate the IOL prediction error. The two different biometry methods are compared.

Results: 100 patients, 75.42 (SD 7.58) years of age, underwent phacoemulsification with IOL implantation. The optical axial length obtained by the IOLMaster was significantly longer (p<0.001, Student’s t test) than the axial length by applanation ultrasound, 23.36 (SD 0.85) mm v 22.89 (0.83) mm. The mean postoperative spherical equivalent was 0.00 (0.40) D and the mean prediction error -0.15 (0.38) D. The mean absolute prediction error was 0.29 (0.27) D. 96% of the eyes were within 1 D from the intended refraction and 93% achieved unaided visual acuity of 6/9 or better. The Holladay formula performed better than the SRK/T, SRK II, and Hoffer Q formulas. Applanation ultrasonography after optimisation of the surgeon factor yielded a greater absolute prediction error than the optimised IOLMaster biometry, 0.41 (0.38) D v 0.25 (0.27) D, with 93% of the eyes within 1 D from the predicted refraction.

Conclusion: IOLMaster optical biometry improves the refractive results of selected cataract surgery patients and is more accurate than applanation ultrasound biometry.

Keywords: cataract; phacoemulsification; biometry; IOLMaster


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Buckhurst, P J, Wolffsohn, J S, Shah, S, Naroo, S A, Davies, L N, Berrow, E J (2009). A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 93: 949-953 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Raymond, S., Favilla, I., Santamaria, L. (2009). Comparing Ultrasound Biometry with Partial Coherence Interferometry for Intraocular Lens Power Calculations: A Randomized Study. IOVS 50: 2547-2552 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Ophthalmology Jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs