EXTENDED REPORT

¹ Department of Visual Neuroscience, Imperial College London, UK
² Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Catherine Stewart
Department of Visual Neuroscience, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Margravine Road, London W6 8RP, UK; c.stewart{at}imperial.ac.uk

Aim: To describe the visual response to spectacle correction ("refractive adaptation") for children with unilateral amblyopia as a function of age, type of amblyopia, and category of refractive error.

Method: Measurement of corrected amblyopic and fellow eye logMAR visual acuity in newly diagnosed children. Measurements repeated at 6 weekly intervals for a total 18 weeks.

Results: Data were collected from 65 children of mean (SD) age 5.1 (1.4) years with previously untreated amblyopia and significant refractive error. Amblyopia was associated with anisometropia in 18 (5.5 (1.4) years), strabismus in 16 (4.2 (0.98) years), and mixed in 31 (5.2 (1.5) years) of the study participants. Mean (SD) corrected visual acuity of amblyopic eyes improved significantly (p<0.001) from 0.67 (0.38) to 0.43 (0.37) logMAR: a mean improvement of 0.24 (0.18), range 0.0–0.6 log units. Change in logMAR visual acuity did not significantly differ as a function of amblyopia type (p = 0.29) (anisometropia 0.22 (0.13); mixed 0.18 (0.14); strabismic 0.30 (0.24)) or for age (p = 0.38) ("under 4 years" 0.23 (0.18); "4–6 years" 0.24 (0.20); "over 6 years" 0.16 (0.23)).

Conclusion: Refractive adaptation is a distinct component of amblyopia treatment. To appropriately evaluate mainstream therapies such as occlusion and penalisation, the beneficial effects of refractive adaptation need to be fully differentiated. A consequence for clinical practice is that children may start occlusion with improved visual acuity, possibly enhancing compliance, and in some cases unnecessary patching will be avoided.

Keywords: amblyopia; refractive correction; efractive adaptation; anisometropia; strabismus; age

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Dahlmann-Noor, A H, Comyn, O, Kostakis, V, Misra, A, Gupta, N, Heath, J, Brown, J, Iron, A, McGill, S, Vrotsou, K, Vivian, A J (2009). Plusoptix Vision Screener: the accuracy and repeatability of refractive measurements using a new autorefractor. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 93: 346-349 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Dahlmann-Noor, A H, Vrotsou, K, Kostakis, V, Brown, J, Heath, J, Iron, A, McGill, S, Vivian, A J (2009). Vision screening in children by Plusoptix Vision Screener compared with gold-standard orthoptic assessment. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 93: 342-345 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stewart, C. E, Wilson, C. M, Fielder, A. R (2009). A 31/2 year old girl presenting with strabismus. BMJ 338: b68-b68 [Full Text]  
• Dobson, V., Miller, J. M., Clifford-Donaldson, C. E., Harvey, E. M. (2008). Associations between Anisometropia, Amblyopia, and Reduced Stereoacuity in a School-Aged Population with a High Prevalence of Astigmatism. IOVS 49: 4427-4436 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Nischal, K. K (2008). Full or partial hypermetropic correction for accommodative esotropia: does it matter?. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 92: 1303-1303 [Full Text]  
• Esteso, P., Castanon, A., Toledo, S., Rito, M. A. P., Ervin, A., Wojciechowski, R., Congdon, N. G. (2007). Correction of Moderate Myopia Is Associated with Improvement in Self-Reported Visual Functioning among Mexican School-Aged Children. IOVS 48: 4949-4954 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stewart, C. E, Stephens, D. A, Fielder, A. R, Moseley, M. J, ROTAS Cooperative, (2007). Objectively monitored patching regimens for treatment of amblyopia: randomised trial. BMJ 335: 707-707 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Dixon-Woods, M, Awan, M, Gottlob, I (2006). Why is compliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopia so hard? A qualitative study. Arch. Dis. Child. 91: 491-494 [Abstract] [Full Text]