SCIENTIFIC REPORT

Reproducibility of circadian retinal and optic nerve head blood flow measurements by Heidelberg retina flowmetry

C P Jonescu-Cuypers^1,2, A Harris², K U Bartz-Schmidt³, L Kagemann², A S Boros¹, U E Heimann¹, B H Lenz¹, R-D Hilgers⁴ and G K Krieglstein¹

¹ Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
² Glaucoma Research and Diagnostic Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Indiana, Indianapolis, USA
³ Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
⁴ Institute for Biometry, University of Aachen (RWTH), Aachen, Germany

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Christian P Jonescu-Cuypers
Laboratory of Biomorphometry and Retinal Perfusion Analysis, Joseph-Stelzmann-Strasse 9, 50924 Cologne, Germany; aia12{at}uni-koeln.de

Background/aim: The Heidelberg retina flowmeter (HRF) is designed to measure retinal capillary blood flow. Previous studies however showed weak reproducibility of data. The intraindividual reproducibility of circadian HRF measurements was examined in healthy subjects in three locations of the retina.

Methods: 36 healthy volunteers (27.3 (SD 4.3) years) were examined by HRF seven times a day (t0–t6). Using a default window of 10x10 pixels, three consecutive measurements were performed in three precise focusing planes: superficial, intermediate and deep layer, peripapillary retina, neuroretinal rim and cup, respectively. Images of identical tissue locations identified by capillary landmarks of each layer were selected to quantify the retinal microcirculation of each volunteer. Means and standard deviations of all flow results of a given subject were calculated, at t0–t6 and the coefficients of variation as a measure of reproducibility.

Results: The coefficients of variation ranged between 8.4% and 41.0% in the superficial layer (mean 19.8% (SD 8.4%)), 10.6%, and 43.0% in the intermediate layer (mean 24.0% (SD 8.4%)), and 9.9% and 84.0% (mean 29.6% (SD 15.8%)) in the deep layer.

Conclusions: These data show the best reproducibility of measurements in the superficial layer followed by the intermediate and the deep layer. Clinically, this is an unsatisfactory intraindividual reproducibility of flow values in each studied layer.

Keywords: blood flow; Heidelberg retina flowmeter; glaucoma; laser Doppler flowmetry; neuroretinal rim

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Siesky, B, Harris, A, Cantor, L B, Kagemann, L, Weitzman, Y, McCranor, L, Marques, C, Werne, A, Stefansson, E (2008). A comparative study of the effects of brinzolamide and dorzolamide on retinal oxygen saturation and ocular microcirculation in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 92: 500-504 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Yu, D.-Y., Townsend, R., Cringle, S. J., Chauhan, B. C., Morgan, W. H. (2005). Improved Interpretation of Flow Maps Obtained by Scanning Laser Doppler Flowmetry Using a Rat Model of Retinal Artery Occlusion. IOVS 46: 166-174 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jonescu-Cuypers, C P, Harris, A, Wilson, R, Kagemann, L, Mavroudis, L V, Topouzis, F, Coleman, A L (2004). Reproducibility of the Heidelberg retinal flowmeter in determining low perfusion areas in peripapillary retina. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 88: 1266-1269 [Abstract] [Full Text]