Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2004;88:1197-1200; doi:10.1136/bjo.2003.029397
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2004;88:1197-1200
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

EXTENDED REPORT

The use of porous polyethylene (Medpor) lower eyelid spacers in lid heightening and stabilisation

J Tan1, J Olver2, M Wright3, R Maini2, C Neoh1 and A J Dickinson1

1 Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
2 Western Eye Hospital, London, UK
3 Velindre NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
A Jane Dickinson
Eye Department, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK; Jane.Dickinson{at}ncl.ac.uk

Background/aims: The management of lower eyelid retraction can be challenging, and established techniques to correct it are not always successful. Previous reports have suggested a role for the ultrathin high density porous polyethylene lower eyelid spacer (Medpor LES) in such patients. The authors report the experience of three surgeons implanting Medpor LES over 1 year, and ascertain whether such implants are a safe and effective alternative to autogenous spacers.

Methods: A prospective, interventional, non-comparative case series of consecutive patients. Surgical indications for Medpor LES were noted. Preoperative and postoperative lower marginal reflex distance (L-MRD), vertical palpebral aperture (PA), lagophthalmos, and scleral show inferior to the limbus (LSS) were recorded, together with major and minor complications.

Results: 32 patients (35 eyelids) had a Medpor LES inserted, 22/32 under local anaesthetic, and nine with adjunctive procedures. Mean follow up was 22 months (range 15–28 months). The Medpor LES was effective in reducing the palpebral aperture (p<0.001) and lagophthalmos (p = 0.04) and raising the lower eyelid height by reducing both L-MRD (p = 0.006) and LSS (p<0.001). However there were major complications in 7/32 patients and minor complications in 8/32, most requiring further surgery. Final outcome was good in 24/35 eyelids and satisfactory in 5/35.

Conclusions: Despite a good or satisfactory final outcome in the majority of patients, the value of this technique is limited by complications, and should be reserved for those unsuitable for safer techniques.

Abbreviations: LES, lower eyelid spacer; L-MRD, lower marginal reflex distance; LSS, scleral show inferior to the limbus; PA, palpebral aperture; PESS, post-enucleation socket syndrome

Keywords: Medpor; porous polyethylene; lower eyelid spacer; implant


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

A Perspective on Porous Polyethylene Lower Lid Spacers
Mandeep S. Bajaj, et al.
BJO Online, 28 Sep 2004 [Full text]
Response to Professor Bajaj
A Jane Dickinson, et al.
BJO Online, 4 Jan 2005 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Ophthalmology Jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs