EXTENDED REPORT

Does visual restitution training change absolute homonymous visual field defects? A fundus controlled study

J Reinhard¹, A Schreiber¹, U Schiefer¹, E. Kasten², B A Sabel², S Kenkel², R Vonthein³ and S Trauzettel-Klosinski¹

¹ University Eye Hospital, Department of Pathophysiology of Vision and Neuro-Ophthalmology, Tübingen, Germany
² Institute of Medical Psychology, University of Magdeburg, Germany
³ Department of Medical Biometry, University of Tübingen, Germany

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Jens Reinhard MD MSc
University Eye Hospital, Schleichstrasse 12–16, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; jens.reinhard{at}med.uni-tuebingen.de

Aim: To examine whether visual restitution training (VRT) is able to change absolute homonymous field defect, assessed with fundus controlled microperimetry, in patients with hemianopia.

Methods: 17 patients with stable homonymous visual field defects before and after a 6 month VRT period were investigated with a specialised microperimetric method using a scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO). Fixation was controlled by SLO fundus monitoring. The size of the field defect was quantified by calculating the ratio of the number of absolute defects and the number of test points; the training effect E was defined as the difference between these two ratios before and after training. A shift of the entire vertical visual field border by 1° would result in an E value of 0.14.

Results: The mean training effect of all right eyes was E = 0.025 (SD 0.052) and all left eyes E = 0.008 (SD 0.034). In one eye, a slight non-homonymous improvement along the horizontal meridian occurred.

Conclusions: In one patient, a slight improvement along the horizontal meridian was found in one eye. In none of the patients was an explicit homonymous change of the absolute field defect border observed after training.

Abbreviations: HRP, high resolution perimetry; SLO, scanning laser ophthalmoscope; wpm, words per minute; VRT, visual restitution training

Keywords: hemianopia; training; scanning laser ophthalmoscope; visual restoration therapy; 270; 263

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Disappointing results from Nova Vision’s visual restoration therapy

J C Horton
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005 89: 1-2. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

BJO at a glance

Creig Hoyt
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005 89: 1a. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

A work out for hemianopia

G T Plant
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005 89: 2. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Huxlin, K. R., Martin, T., Kelly, K., Riley, M., Friedman, D. I., Burgin, W. S., Hayhoe, M. (2009). Perceptual Relearning of Complex Visual Motion after V1 Damage in Humans. J. Neurosci. 29: 3981-3991 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rowe, F., Brand, D., Jackson, C. A., Price, A., Walker, L., Harrison, S., Eccleston, C., Scott, C., Akerman, N., Dodridge, C., Howard, C., Shipman, T., Sperring, U., MacDiarmid, S., Freeman, C. (2009). Visual impairment following stroke: do stroke patients require vision assessment?. Age Ageing 38: 188-193 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Brodtmann, A., Puce, A., Darby, D., Donnan, G. (2009). Serial Functional Imaging Poststroke Reveals Visual Cortex Reorganization. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23: 150-159 [Abstract]  
• Roth, T., Sokolov, A. N., Messias, A., Roth, P., Weller, M., Trauzettel-Klosinski, S. (2009). Comparing explorative saccade and flicker training in hemianopia: A randomized controlled study. Neurology 72: 324-331 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bowers, A. R., Keeney, K., Peli, E. (2008). Community-Based Trial of a Peripheral Prism Visual Field Expansion Device for Hemianopia. Arch Ophthalmol 126: 657-664 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bouwmeester, L., Heutink, J., Lucas, C. (2007). The effect of visual training for patients with visual field defects due to brain damage: a systematic review. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 78: 555-564 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Glisson, C. C., Galetta, S. L. (2007). Visual rehabilitation: Now you see it; now you don't. Neurology 68: 1881-1882 [Full Text]  
• Raninen, A, Vanni, S, Hyvarinen, L, Nasanen, R (2007). Temporal sensitivity in a hemianopic visual field can be improved by long-term training using flicker stimulation. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 78: 66-73 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jones, S. A., Shinton, R. A. (2006). Improving outcome in stroke patients with visual problems. Age Ageing 35: 560-565 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sahraie, A., Trevethan, C. T., MacLeod, M. J., Murray, A. D., Olson, J. A., Weiskrantz, L. (2006). Increased sensitivity after repeated stimulation of residual spatial channels in blindsight. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 14971-14976 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schreiber, A., Vonthein, R., Reinhard, J., Trauzettel-Klosinski, S., Connert, C., Schiefer, U. (2006). Effect of visual restitution training on absolute homonymous scotomas.. Neurology 67: 143-145 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sabel, B. A (2006). Vision restoration therapy and raising red flags too early. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 90: 659-660 [Full Text]  
• Caplan, L R, Firlik, A, Newman, N J, Pless, M, Romano, J G, Schatz, N (2005). Vision restoration therapy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 89: 1229-1229 [Full Text]  
• Horton, J C (2005). Vision restoration therapy: confounded by eye movements. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 89: 792-794 [Full Text]  
• Sabel, B A, Kenkel, S, Kasten, E (2005). Vision restoration therapy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 89: 522-524 [Full Text]