Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;89:87-91; doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.042937
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;89:87-91
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

EXTENDED REPORT

A method of drusen measurement based on reconstruction of fundus background reflectance

R T Smith, J K Chan, T Nagasaki, J R Sparrow and I Barbazetto

Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr R T Smith
Harkness Eye Institute Columbia University College of Pysicians and Surgeons, New York, NY10032, USA; rts1{at}columbia.edu

Background: The hallmarks of age related macular degeneration (AMD) are the subretinal deposits known as drusen. Current manual methods of drusen segmentation and quantification are laborious and subjective. The authors introduced a digital method and tested it for accuracy and reliability.

Methods: Fourteen eyes with drusen were selected. The authors digitally reconstructed the macular background using normal background areas ("dots") fitted to quadratic polynomials in two zones. The model was used to level the reflectance for the purpose of segmenting drusen by a global threshold. Measurements of drusen areas were compared with those of a semi-automated background levelling technique and manual drawings from stereo pairs.

Results: Intraobserver reproducibility had standard deviations from 0.1% to 4.1%. Interobserver reproducibility yielded 95% limits of agreement of –2.7% to 6.3%. The dots method compared with manual drawings and with the semi-automated method had 95% limits of agreement of –8.3% to 2.8% and –7.1% to 4.8%, respectively.

Conclusions: The dots method was reproducible and accurate with respect to validated methods. It provided less total operating time and greater precision than that of standard fundus photo grading. With implementation of commercial software, this technique for macular image analysis has potential for use in clinical research.

Abbreviations: AMD, age related macular degeneration; CMGS, Columbia Macular Genetics Study

Keywords: age related macular degeneration; digital imaging; drusen; macula; quantification


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Smith, R. T., Chan, J. K., Busuoic, M., Sivagnanavel, V., Bird, A. C., Chong, N. V. (2006). Autofluorescence Characteristics of Early, Atrophic, and High-Risk Fellow Eyes in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. IOVS 47: 5495-5504 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Smith, R. T., Chan, J. K., Nagasaki, T., Ahmad, U. F., Barbazetto, I., Sparrow, J., Figueroa, M., Merriam, J. (2005). Automated Detection of Macular Drusen Using Geometric Background Leveling and Threshold Selection. Arch Ophthalmol 123: 200-206 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Ophthalmology Jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs