SCIENTIFIC REPORT

The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry

A Kotecha, E T White, J M Shewry and D F Garway-Heath

Glaucoma Research Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
D F Garway-Heath
MD FRCOphth, Glaucoma Research Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UK; david.garway-heath{at}moorfields.nhs.uk

Aims: To establish the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT) on intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with a prototype Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (DCT), to evaluate the effect of CCT and age on the agreement between IOP measured with the Pascal DCT and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and to compare the interobserver and intraobserver variation of the DCT with the GAT.

Methods: GAT and DCT IOP measurements were made on 130 eyes of 130 patients and agreement was assessed by means of Bland-Altman plots. The effect of CCT and age on GAT/DCT IOP differences was assessed by linear regression analysis. Interobserver and intraobserver variations for GAT and DCT were assessed in 100 eyes of 100 patients.

Results: The mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between GAT and DCT was –0.7 (–6.3 to 4.9) mm Hg. GAT/DCT IOP differences increased with thicker CCT (slope 0.017 mm Hg/µm, 95% CI 0.004 to 0.03, r² = 0.05, p = 0.01), and with greater age, slope 0.05 mm Hg/year (95% CI 0.012 to 0.084, r² = 0.05, p = 0.01). The intraobserver variability of GAT and DCT was 1.7 mm Hg and 3.2 mm Hg, respectively. The interobserver variability was (mean difference (95% limits of agreement)) 0.4 (–3.5 to 4.2) mm Hg for GAT and 0.2 (–4.9 to 5.3) mm Hg for DCT.

Conclusions: GAT is significantly more affected than DCT by both CCT and subject age. The effect of age suggests an age related corneal biomechanical change that may induce measurement error additional to that of CCT. The prototype DCT has greater measurement variability than the GAT.

Abbreviations: CCT, central corneal thickness; DCT, dynamic contour tonometer; GAT, Goldmann applanation tonometer; IOP, intraocular pressure; LASIK, laser in situ keratomileusis

Keywords: dynamic contour tonometry; central corneal thickness; age; intraobserver variability; interobserver variability

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Read, S. A., Collins, M. J., Iskander, D. R. (2008). Diurnal Variation of Axial Length, Intraocular Pressure, and Anterior Eye Biometrics. IOVS 49: 2911-2918 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Boehm, A. G., Weber, A., Pillunat, L. E., Koch, R., Spoerl, E. (2008). Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Comparison to Intracameral IOP Measurements. IOVS 49: 2472-2477 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hamilton, K, Pye, D, Hua, S, Yu, F, Chung, J, Hou, Q (2007). The effect of contact lens induced oedema on the accuracy of Goldmann tonometry in a mature population. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 91: 1636-1638 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ismail, A R, Lamont, M, Perera, S, Khan-Lim, D, Mehta, R, Macleod, J D A, Anderson, D F (2007). Comparison of IOP measurement using GAT and DCT in patients with penetrating keratoplasties. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 91: 980-981 [Full Text]  
• Grieshaber, M. C., Schoetzau, A., Zawinka, C., Flammer, J., Orgul, S. (2007). Effect of Central Corneal Thickness on Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Primary Open-angle Glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 125: 740-744 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kotecha, A., Elsheikh, A., Roberts, C. R., Zhu, H., Garway-Heath, D. F. (2006). Corneal Thickness- and Age-Related Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea Measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer. IOVS 47: 5337-5347 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gonzalez-Meijome, J M, Jorge, J, Queiros, A, Fernandes, P, Montes-Mico, R, Almeida, J B, Parafita, M A (2006). Age differences in central and peripheral intraocular pressure using a rebound tonometer. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 90: 1495-1500 [Abstract] [Full Text]