BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

British Journal of Ophthalmology 2006;90:14-16; doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.077115
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tan, G S W
Right arrow Articles by Aung, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tan, G S W
Right arrow Articles by Aung, T
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

SCIENTIFIC REPORT

Visual acuity after acute primary angle closure and considerations for primary lens extraction

G S W Tan1, S-T Hoh1, R Husain1,2, G Gazzard1,2, F T S Oen1, S K L Seah1, T Aung1,3

1 Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
2 Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
3 National University of Singapore, Singapore

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Tin Aung
Glaucoma Department, Singapore National Eye Centre, 11 Third Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168751: tin11{at}pacific.net.sg


ABSTRACT
Background/aim: Primary lens extraction has been advocated for acute primary angle closure (APAC), but it is not known if this is warranted in all cases. The aim of this study was to investigate the visual acuity (VA) of APAC eyes shortly after resolution of the acute episode in order to assess the appropriateness of performing such surgery in this condition.

Methods: This was a prospective observational case series. As part of a randomised controlled trial comparing phacoemulsification and laser iridotomy, 135 consecutive APAC subjects over a 2 year period underwent subjective refraction and measurement of Snellen VA once the acute episode had resolved with reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) and improved corneal clarity.

Results: Subjects were predominantly Chinese (95.6%) and female (79.3%), with a mean age of 63.6 (SD 9.6) years. When assessed 1.7 (2.7) days after presentation, the majority of APAC cases (50.4%) had good VA (6/12 or better), with more than a quarter of cases having VA of 6/7.5 or better. Poor VA was associated with duration of symptoms (p = 0.04, OR = 4.1, 95% CI 1.1 to 15.7) and time taken to resolution of APAC (p = 0.04, OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.02 to 4.6), but not with sex (p = 0.31), age (p = 0.26), duration from presentation to measurement of visual acuity (p = 0.53), or presenting IOP (p = 0.73).

Conclusion: Within days after APAC, more than half of APAC affected eyes had good VA (6/12 or better). The role of lens extraction in the management of APAC warrants further debate, especially for eyes with good VA.


Abbreviations: APAC, acute primary angle closure; IOP, intraocular pressure; LPI, laser peripheral iridotomy; VA, visual acuity

Keywords: visual acuity; primary angle closure; intraocular pressure; lens extraction


Related Articles

Lens extraction in primary angle closure
W Nolan
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006 90: 1-2. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

BJO at a Glance
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006 90: 1. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.