Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 6 July 2006. doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.093393
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2006;90:1404-1409
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

EXTENDED REPORT

The North Jutland County Diabetic Retinopathy Study: population characteristics

L L Knudsen1, H-H Lervang2, S Lundbye-Christensen3 and A Gorst-Rasmussen3

1 Department of Ophthalmology, Aalborg Sygehus South, Aarhus University Hospital, Hobrovej, Aalborg, Denmark
2 Department of Medical Endocrinology, Aalborg Sygehus North, Aarhus University Hospital
3 Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University, Aalborg

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
L L Knudsen
Department of Ophthalmology, Aalborg Sygehus South, Aarhus University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, Aalborg DK-9100, Denmark; u19204{at}aas.nja.dk

Background: Several population-based studies have reported blood glucose levels and blood pressure to be risk factors for the development of diabetic retinopathy. These studies were initiated more than two decades ago and may therefore reflect the treatment and population composition of a previous era, suggesting new studies of the present population with diabetes.

Aim and methods: This cross-section study included 656 people with type 1 diabetes and 328 with type 2 diabetes. Crude prevalence rates of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, clinically significant macular oedema and several specific retinal lesions were assessed, together with their association to a simplified and internationally approved retinal grading.

Results: The point prevalence of proliferative retinopathy was found to be 0.8% and 0.3% for type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Equivalent prevalence rates of clinically significant macular oedema were 7.9% and 12.8%, respectively. The most frequently occurring retinal manifestations increased in number until retinopathy level 3, and then decreased.

Conclusion: The point prevalence of proliferative retinopathy is lower than that found in previous studies, whereas it is increased for clinically significant macular oedema. These data suggest different risk factors for these clinical entities.

Abbreviations: ETDRS, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; IQR, interquartile range; WESDR, Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Vallance, J. H., Wilson, P. J., Leese, G. P., McAlpine, R., MacEwen, C. J., Ellis, J. D. (2008). Diabetic Retinopathy: More Patients, Less Laser: A longitudinal population-based study in Tayside, Scotland. Diabetes Care 31: 1126-1131 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Knudsen, L L, Lervang, H-H, Lundbye-Christensen, S, Gorst-Rasmussen, A (2007). The North Jutland County Diabetic Retinopathy Study (NCDRS) 2. Non-ophthalmic parameters and clinically significant macular oedema. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 91: 1593-1595 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dodson, P. M (2007). Diabetic retinopathy: treatment and prevention. Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research 4: S9-S11 [Abstract]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Ophthalmology Jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs