Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 18 January 2006. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.076091
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2006;90:713-717
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

SCIENTIFIC REPORT

Double masked randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of paracetamol in reducing pain in panretinal photocoagulation

D Vaideanu1, P Taylor1, P McAndrew2, A Hildreth2, J P Deady1 and D H Steel1

1 Sunderland Eye Infirmary, UK
2 Sunderland Royal Hospital, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Daniela Vaideanu
Sunderland Eye Infirmary, Queen Alexandra Road, Sunderland, UK; daniela.vaideanu{at}ncl.ac.uk

ABSTRACT

Aim: To assess the effectiveness of pre-emptive analgesia with paracetamol in reducing pain associated with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in a prospective, double masked, randomised controlled trial.

Method: 60 patients undergoing PRP for the first time were enrolled and randomised to paracetamol or placebo, taken for 2 days starting 24 hours before the laser treatment. The laser treatment was performed following a standardised protocol. Pain during and after treatment was assessed using the McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ) and visual analogue scales (VAS).

Results: The statistical analysis looked for differences between the two study groups immediately after the laser surgery and 24 hours later. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome measure of perception of pain during and 24 hours after PRP, between the paracetamol and placebo group. However, none of the patients in the paracetamol group reported increased total pain at 24 hours, whereas six patients in the placebo group reported increased pain; this difference (21%) was significant to p = 0.01.

Conclusions: Pre-emptive analgesia with paracetamol did not significantly reduce pain associated with PRP. This study has described for the first time the type of pain associated with PRP, which is perceived mainly as a discomfort. The main attributes of the pain that patients described, were sharp, flashing, tiring, intense, piercing, intermittent, and brief.

Abbreviations: PPI, present pain intensity; PRI, pain rate index; PRI-T, total pain rate index; PRP, panretinal photocoagulation; MPQ, McGill pain questionnaire; VAS, visual analogue scale

Keywords: panretinal photocoagulation; pain; pre-emptive analgesia; paracetamol


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Ophthalmology Jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs