Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 10 May 2006. doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.092650
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2006;90:990-993
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

SCIENTIFIC REPORT

Effects of presentation method on the understanding of informed consent

T H Moseley1, M N Wiggins1 and P O’Sullivan2

1 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Jones Eye Institute, Little Rock, AR, USA
2 University of California San Franciso School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Michael Wiggins
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Jones Eye Institute, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA; wigginsmichael{at}uams.edu

ABSTRACT

Background/aim: Knowledge of which presentation methods impart the most information to patients can improve the informed consent discussion. The purpose of this study was to determine if the comprehension and recall of the informed consent discussion varied with presentation method.

Methods: Randomised, prospective study at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. 90 freshmen medical students were randomly assigned to one of three groups and separately went through an informed consent on cataract surgery. Group A heard an informed consent presentation. Group B was shown diagrams while hearing the same presentation. Group C heard the consent and then watched an informational video on cataract surgery. A 10 point multiple choice quiz was administered after the presentation and repeated again 1 week later.

Results: Scores from each group were averaged as number correct out of 10 questions. For same day scores, group C scores (7.70 (SD 1.24)) were significantly higher than group A (6.39 (1.63)). One week testing revealed that group C (6.96 (1.62)) recalled more between the two time periods and scored significantly higher than groups A (5.15 (2.11)) and B (5.54 (1.64)).

Conclusions: This study found differences in the participants’ ability to recall facts based on the manner in which the material was presented. It clearly demonstrated that the use of visual aids improved the ability to remember facts and risks associated with cataract surgery beyond a verbal presentation alone. It also showed a benefit of the repetition of information as provided by audiovisual presentations that can be used in conjunction with the physician-patient discussion.

Keywords: informed consent; cataract surgery


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Ophthalmology Jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs