Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 10 May 2007. doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.120980
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2007;91:1364-1368
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

EXTENDED REPORT

Novel pressure-to-cornea index in glaucoma

Milko E Iliev1, Alexander Meyenberg1, Ernst Buerki2, George Shafranov3 and M Bruce Shields3

1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
2 Private practice, Ophthalmologists Association Thun, Thun, Switzerland
3 Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA

Correspondence to:
Milko E Iliev, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bern, Inselspital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; milko.iliev{at}insel.ch

Background: Several conversion tables and formulas have been suggested to correct applanation intraocular pressure (IOP) for central corneal thickness (CCT). CCT is also thought to represent an independent glaucoma risk factor. In an attempt to integrate IOP and CCT into a unified risk factor and avoid uncertain correction for tonometric inaccuracy, a new pressure-to-cornea index (PCI) is proposed.

Methods: PCI (IOP/CCT3) was defined as the ratio between untreated IOP and CCT3 in mm (ultrasound pachymetry). PCI distribution in 220 normal controls, 53 patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), 76 with ocular hypertension (OHT), and 89 with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) was investigated. PCI’s ability to discriminate between glaucoma (NTG+POAG) and non-glaucoma (controls+OHT) was compared with that of three published formulae for correcting IOP for CCT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built.

Results: Mean PCI values were: Controls 92.0 (SD 24.8), NTG 129.1 (SD 25.8), OHT 134.0 (SD 26.5), POAG 173.6 (SD 40.9). To minimise IOP bias, eyes within the same 2 mm Hg range between 16 and 29 mm Hg (16–17, 18–19, etc) were separately compared: control and NTG eyes as well as OHT and POAG eyes differed significantly. PCI demonstrated a larger area under the ROC curve (AUC) and significantly higher sensitivity at fixed 80% and 90% specificities compared with each of the correction formulas; optimum PCI cut-off value 133.8.

Conclusions: A PCI range of 120–140 is proposed as the upper limit of "normality", 120 being the cut-off value for eyes with untreated pressures <=21 mm Hg, 140 when untreated pressure >=22 mm Hg. PCI may reflect individual susceptibility to a given IOP level, and thus represent a glaucoma risk factor. Longitudinal studies are needed to prove its prognostic value.

Abbreviations: CCT, central corneal thickness; IOP, intraocular pressure; NTG, normal-tension glaucoma; OHT, ocular hypertension; PCI, pressure-to-cornea index; POAG, primary open-angle glaucoma; ROC, receiver operating characteristic


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Ophthalmology Jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs