SCIENTIFIC REPORT

Inferring myopia over the lifecourse from uncorrected distance visual acuity in childhood

Phillippa M Cumberland¹, Catherine S Peckham¹ and Jugnoo S Rahi²

¹ Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, London, UK
² Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Ophthalmology/Visual Sciences Unit, Institute of Child Health/Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
J S Rahi
Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK; j.rahi{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk

Aim: To report the usefulness of uncorrected distance visual acuity (DVA) at 16 years to "screen" for myopia status and to assess the lifetime risk of myopia, based on a national birth cohort.

Methods: 1867 members of the 1958 British birth cohort for whom there were data on acuity at 16 years had autorefraction, as part of a biomedical survey, at 45 years. Reduced uncorrected DVA at age 16 years (6/12 or worse in both eyes) was compared with adult refraction (spherical equivalent).

Results: Only a quarter of individuals in the population studied who had developed myopia by 45 years of age had reduced acuity at 16 years of age. Notably, half of all adults with moderate myopia (–2.99 to –5.99) and 31% (11/35) with severe myopia (–6) had good uncorrected DVA in both eyes at 16 years of age. Thus, sensitivities were low, ranging from 16% for all myopia (cut-off point spherical equivalent –0.5) to 69% for severe myopia (cut-off point spherical equivalent –6). However, a high (91%) lifetime probability of primary myopia (spherical equivalent –0.5) given a reduced uncorrected DVA at 16 years was found.

Conclusion: In this population, reduced uncorrected DVA in childhood is an inaccurate and inappropriate intermediate "phenotype" for capturing adult myopia status. However, our findings support assessment of DVA in secondary school children as an effective method of identifying refractive error (both myopia and hypermetropia).

Abbreviations: PPV, positive predictive value

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

BJO at a glance

Creig Hoyt
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007 91: 127. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Lopes, M. C., Andrew, T., Carbonaro, F., Spector, T. D., Hammond, C. J. (2009). Estimating Heritability and Shared Environmental Effects for Refractive Error in Twin and Family Studies. IOVS 50: 126-131 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Williams, C, Miller, L L, Gazzard, G, Saw, S M (2008). A comparison of measures of reading and intelligence as risk factors for the development of myopia in a UK cohort of children. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 92: 1117-1121 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rudnicka, A. R, Owen, C. G, Richards, M., Wadsworth, M. E., Strachan, D. P (2008). Effect of breastfeeding and sociodemographic factors on visual outcome in childhood and adolescence. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 87: 1392-1399 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Williams, C, Miller, L, Northstone, K, Sparrow, J M (2008). The use of non-cycloplegic autorefraction data in general studies of children's development. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 92: 723-724 [Full Text]  
• Atherton, K, Fuller, E, Shepherd, P, Strachan, D P, Power, C (2008). Loss and representativeness in a biomedical survey at age 45 years: 1958 British birth cohort. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 62: 216-223 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Simpson, C. L., Hysi, P., Bhattacharya, S. S., Hammond, C. J., Webster, A., Peckham, C. S., Sham, P. C., Rahi, J. S. (2007). The Roles of PAX6 and SOX2 in Myopia: Lessons from the 1958 British Birth Cohort. IOVS 48: 4421-4425 [Abstract] [Full Text]