Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 27 September 2006. doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.099275
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2007;91:667-672
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

EXTENDED REPORT

Efficacy and safety of short duration azithromycin eye drops versus azithromycin single oral dose for the treatment of trachoma in children: a randomised, controlled, double-masked clinical trial

Isabelle Cochereau1, Pablo Goldschmidt2, André Goepogui3, Tayyab Afghani4, Laurent Delval5, Pascale Pouliquen5, Tristan Bourcier6 and Pierre-Yves Robert7

1 Service d’Ophtalmologie, CHU d’Angers, Angers, France
2 Laboratoire, CNO des XV-XX, Paris, France
3 Hôpital Donka, Conakry, Guinea
4 Al-Shifa Trust Eye Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
5 Laboratoires Théa, Clermont-Ferrand, France
6 CNO des XV-XX, Paris, France
7 Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire Dupuytren, Limoges Cedex, France

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
I Cochereau
Service d’Ophtalmologie, CHU d’Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49033 Angers, France; iscochereau{at}chu-angers.fr

Aims: Efficacy and safety of a short-duration treatment of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops versus oral azithromycin to treat active trachoma.

Methods: Randomised, controlled, double-masked, double-dummy, non-inferiority explanatory study including 670 children from Guinea Conakry and Pakistan if: 1–10 years old; active trachoma (TF+TI0 or TF+TI+ on simplified World Health Organisation (WHO) scale). Three groups received either: azithromycin 1.5% eye drops twice daily for 2 days, for 3 days or azithromycin single 20 mg/kg oral dose. Patients’ contacts were treated whenever possible. Clinical evaluation was performed using a binocular loupe. Primary efficacy variable was the cure (no active trachoma (TF0)) at day 60. Non-inferiority margin for difference between cure rates was 10%.

Results: Cure rate in per protocol set was as follows: 93.0%, 96.3% and 96.6% in 2-day group 3-day group, and oral treatment group, respectively. Azithromycin 1.5% groups were non-inferior to oral azithromycin. The intend to treat (ITT) analysis supported the results. Clinical re-emergence rate was low: 4.2%. Ocular tolerance was similar for all groups. No treatment related adverse events were reported. Logistic regression analyses found prognostic factors such as: country (p<0.001) and trachoma severity (p = 0.003).

Conclusions: In active trachoma, azithromycin eye drops twice daily for 2 or 3 days are as efficient as the WHO’s reference treatment and represent an innovative alternative to oral azithromycin.

Abbreviations: GCP, good clinical practice; ITT, intend to treat; TF0, no active trachoma; (TF+TI0), trachomatous inflammation – follicular; (TF+TI), trachomatous inflammation – follicular and intense; WHO, World Health Organisation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

BJO at a glance
Creig Hoyt
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007 91: 563. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Topical azithromycin: new evidence?
Hannah Kuper and Richard Wormald
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007 91: 566-567. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Ophthalmology Jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs