British Journal of Ophthalmology 2007;91:667-672
EXTENDED REPORT
Efficacy and safety of short duration azithromycin eye drops versus azithromycin single oral dose for the treatment of trachoma in children: a randomised, controlled, double-masked clinical trial
1 Service dOphtalmologie, CHU dAngers, Angers, France
2 Laboratoire, CNO des XV-XX, Paris, France
3 Hôpital Donka, Conakry, Guinea
4 Al-Shifa Trust Eye Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
5 Laboratoires Théa, Clermont-Ferrand, France
6 CNO des XV-XX, Paris, France
7 Service dOphtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire Dupuytren, Limoges Cedex, France
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
I Cochereau
Service dOphtalmologie, CHU dAngers, 4, rue Larrey, 49033 Angers, France; iscochereau{at}chu-angers.fr
Aims: Efficacy and safety of a short-duration treatment of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops versus oral azithromycin to treat active trachoma.
Methods: Randomised, controlled, double-masked, double-dummy, non-inferiority explanatory study including 670 children from Guinea Conakry and Pakistan if: 110 years old; active trachoma (TF+TI0 or TF+TI+ on simplified World Health Organisation (WHO) scale). Three groups received either: azithromycin 1.5% eye drops twice daily for 2 days, for 3 days or azithromycin single 20 mg/kg oral dose. Patients contacts were treated whenever possible. Clinical evaluation was performed using a binocular loupe. Primary efficacy variable was the cure (no active trachoma (TF0)) at day 60. Non-inferiority margin for difference between cure rates was 10%.
Results: Cure rate in per protocol set was as follows: 93.0%, 96.3% and 96.6% in 2-day group 3-day group, and oral treatment group, respectively. Azithromycin 1.5% groups were non-inferior to oral azithromycin. The intend to treat (ITT) analysis supported the results. Clinical re-emergence rate was low: 4.2%. Ocular tolerance was similar for all groups. No treatment related adverse events were reported. Logistic regression analyses found prognostic factors such as: country (p<0.001) and trachoma severity (p = 0.003).
Conclusions: In active trachoma, azithromycin eye drops twice daily for 2 or 3 days are as efficient as the WHOs reference treatment and represent an innovative alternative to oral azithromycin.
Abbreviations: GCP, good clinical practice; ITT, intend to treat; TF0, no active trachoma; (TF+TI0), trachomatous inflammation follicular; (TF+TI), trachomatous inflammation follicular and intense; WHO, World Health Organisation
Relevant Articles
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007 91: 563.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007 91: 566-567.
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
