Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 21 February 2007. doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.098525
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2007;91:1042-1047
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

EXTENDED REPORT

Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular disease: a review of the first 233 cases from the UK user group

Valerie P J Saw1, Darwin Minassian3, John K G Dart1, Andrew Ramsay1, Hugo Henderson2, Stefan Poniatowski4, Ruth M Warwick4, Suzanne Cabral1 and the Amniotic Membrane Tissue User Group (AMTUG)

1 Cornea and External Disease Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
2 Adnexal Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
3 Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK
4 NHS BT Tissue Services, Deansbrook Road, Edgware, Middlesex, HA8 9BD

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Valerie P J Saw
FRANZCO, Moorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Rd, London EC1V 2PD, UK; v.saw{at}ucl.ac.uk

Background: Amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT), as a new tool in the armamentarium of therapies available for ocular surface problems, became widely available in the UK in 1998. This study evaluates the indications for treatment, the surgical procedures used, and the results of a subset of the first AMT cases carried out by the group using this nationally available supply. This user group model provides data which is different from that obtained from uncontrolled case series, or clinical trials, and may be more representative of the outcomes that can be expected when a procedure becomes widely available.

Methods: The first 233 AMTs, performed by the UK user group, were evaluated by audit and outcomes were assessed at 3 months.

Results: Of the 233 transplants, there were 126 (54.1%) valid outcome returns: the outcome for persistent epithelial defects was a healed and stable surface in 11/35 (31.4%, 95% CI 16.9 to 49.3); for chemical/thermal injuries, a healed uninflamed eye with clear cornea in 5/18 (27.8%, 95% CI 9.7 to 53.4); for bullous keratopathy a pain-free, stable surface without bullae in 4/18 (22.2%, 95% CI 6.4 to 47.6); for ocular surface reconstruction, an epithelialised uninflamed conjunctiva without scarring in 12/23 (52.2%, 95% CI 30.6 to 73.2); and for limbal stem cell deficiency, a corneal phenotype in 4/7 (57.1%). The operative technique least associated with failure was use of a bandage contact lens at the end of the procedure (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.59, p = 0.004). Previous treatment with topical steroids was significantly associated with failure (OR 5.70, 95% CI 1.77 to 18.43, p = 0.004).

Conclusion: Although the outcome criteria used in this study were stringent, and the follow-up duration was short, the results of AMT by this user group were generally less favourable than those of previously reported case series. Controlled clinical trials would improve the quality of evidence for use of amniotic membrane in ocular disease.

Abbreviations: AM, amniotic membrane; AMT, amniotic membrane transplantation; AMTUG, amniotic membrane tissue user group; BK, bullous keratopathy; BM, basement membrane; CHEM, chemical/thermal injury; LSCD, limbal stem cell deficiency; NLTB, North London Tissue Bank; OSR, ocular surface reconstruction; PED, persistent epithelial defect; TRAB, trabeculectomy

Keywords: amnion; corneal ulcer; bullous keratopathy; chemical burns; ocular surface reconstruction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Han, Y. M., Romero, R., Kim, J.-S., Tarca, A. L., Kim, S. K., Draghici, S., Kusanovic, J. P., Gotsch, F., Mittal, P., Hassan, S. S., Kim, C. J. (2008). Region-Specific Gene Expression Profiling: Novel Evidence for Biological Heterogeneity of the Human Amnion. Biol. Reprod. 79: 954-961 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Ophthalmology Jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs