Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 9 September 2008. doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.141721
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2008;92:1636-1641
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

A study comparing two protocols of treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

L Arias1,2, J M Caminal1, L Casas3, C Masuet3, M B Badia4, M Rubio1, O Pujol1 and J Arruga1

1 Department of Ophthalmology. Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
2 Institut de la Màcula i de la Retina, Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain
3 Department of Preventive Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
4 Department of Pharmacy. Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Correspondence to:
Dr L Arias, Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, C/Feixa Llarga, sn, 08907 – L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; luisarias{at}telefonica.net

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare two treatment options for choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD): (1) bevacizumab administered once a month for 3 months and thereafter as needed (loading dose (LD)); and (2) bevacizumab administered as needed, after the first injection (pro re nata (as needed) (PRN)).

Methods: Fifty consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective study. The first 25 patients were included in the LD group and the last 25 patients in the PRN group. In both groups, the need for re-treatment was based on the presence of persistent or recurrent macular oedema, subretinal fluid or pigment epithelial detachment on optical coherence tomography scans.

Results: At the 6-month follow-up, mean visual acuity improved by 13.7 letters (p<0.001) in the LD group and 4.6 in the PRN group (p<0.001). Thirty-six per cent of patients in the LD group compared with 12% in the PRN group gained 15 or more letters (p = 0.04). Mean foveal thickness decreased by 91.3 µm (p<0.001) in the LD group and 48.2 µm in the PRN group (p<0.001). No ocular or systemic side effects were observed.

Conclusion: Patients with CNV secondary to AMD treated with a LD protocol had better results than patients treated with a PRN protocol with intravitreal bevacizumab.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

At a glance
Harminder S Dua, Harminder S Dua, and Arun D Singh
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2008 92: 1. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Ophthalmology Jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs