This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: bjo.2007.125906v1 92/3/315    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Limburg, H. Articles by Foster, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Limburg, H. Articles by Foster, A.

Review of recent surveys on blindness and visual impairment in Latin America

¹ International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
² Servicio de Oftalmologia, Hospital Regional, Universidad de Concepción, San Martin 1350, Concepción 407-0060, Chile
³ Instituto Vision, Montemorelos, Nuevo Léon, Mexico
⁴ Pan American Health Organization, Cra 7a No 74-21 P 9o, Santafé de Bogotá DC, Colombia
⁵ International Centre for Eye Health, Clinical Research Unit, Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK

Correspondence to:
Hans Limburg, MD PhD, Consultant, Nijenburg 32, 1613LC Grootebroek, The Netherlands; hlimburg{at}quicknet.nl

Aims: To review recent data on prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in Latin America.

Method: Data from recent population-based prevalence surveys in nine countries in Latin America, covering 30 544 people aged 50 years and older, are presented.

Results: The prevalence of bilateral blindness (VA <3/60 in the better eye with available correction) ranged from 1.3% in urban Buenos Aires, Argentina, to 4.0% in two rural districts of Peru; low vision from 5.9% in Buenos Aires to 12.5% in rural Guatemala. Cataract was the main cause of blindness (41–87%), followed by posterior segment disease (7–47%). Avoidable blindness ranged from 43% in urban Brazil to 94% in rural Guatemala.

Conclusions: 43% to 88% of all blindness in Latin America is curable, being caused by cataract and refractive errors. Simple and cost-effective intervention strategies exist and need to be made available to more people. Also, the visual outcome from cataract surgery can be improved. In the urban areas with adequate eye care services, blindness and low vision due to posterior segment disease are increasing. Results from these surveys may help planners to estimate the prevalence and causes of blindness in their own area or country.

Competing interests: None.