BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

British Journal of Ophthalmology 2008;92:594-597; doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.133843
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anshu, A
Right arrow Articles by Chee, S-P
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anshu, A
Right arrow Articles by Chee, S-P

GLOBAL ISSUES

Syphilitic uveitis: an Asian perspective

A Anshu1, C L Cheng1, S-P Chee1,2

1 Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
2 National University of Singapore, Singapore

Correspondence to:
Associate Professor S-P Chee, FRCS(G), FRCOphth, Ocular Inflammation and Immunology Services, Singapore National Eye Centre, 11, Third Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168751; chee.soon.phaik{at}snec.com.sg

Aim: To examine the clinical manifestations of syphilitic uveitis in a population and review trends in incidence at a tertiary referral centre.

Methods: A retrospective, non-comparative interventional case series of 22 consecutive patients with syphilitic uveitis who were managed in the Ocular Inflammation and Immunology Services of the Singapore National Eye Centre between 1995 and 2006.

Results: Twenty-two patients (mean age 52.7 years, range 18–78) with a positive serum fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test (100%) and negative HIV serology were reviewed. Non-granulomatous anterior uveitis was the commonest presenting finding (18/29 eyes, 62.06%). Posterior uveitis was seen in four (13.7%), intermediate uveitis in three (10.3%) and panuveitis was seen in eight (27.5%) eyes at presentation. Vitritis (19 eyes, 65.4%) was the commonest posterior segment finding. The majority (86.4%) had latent syphilis at the time of ocular involvement. An increasing trend in the number of cases of ocular syphilis in the past decade was not observed.

Conclusions: Despite resurgence in infectious syphilis, this centre did not see a dramatic rise in cases of syphilitic uveitis. Ocular syphilis presented most frequently as a non-granulomatous inflammation. Therefore, syphilis serology should be sought even for cases of anterior uveitis.


Competing interests: None.

Ethics approval: Approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Ocular Inflammation and Immunology Service of the Singapore National Eye Centre.

Patient consent: Informed consent was obtained for publication of figures 2 and 3.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.