BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

British Journal of Ophthalmology 2008;92:609-611; doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.106518
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aboshiha, J
Right arrow Articles by Lovering, A
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aboshiha, J
Right arrow Articles by Lovering, A

GLOBAL ISSUES

To what extent does a lack of refrigeration of generic chloramphenicol eye-drops used in India decrease their purity and what are the implications for Europe?

J Aboshiha1, R Weir1,2, P Singh3, P Ewings4, A Lovering5

1 Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK
2 Ophthalmology Department, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
3 Ophthalmology Department, Furness General Hospital, Barrow in Furness, UK
4 Statistical Department, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK
5 Bristol Centre for Antimicrobial Research and Evaluation, Bristol, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr J Aboshiha, 33 Turketel Road, Folkestone CT20 2NZ, UK; jonathan.aboshiha{at}gmail.com

Background/aims: Thermal degradation of chloramphenicol occurs at a faster rate when stored in unrefrigerated conditions. This study measures the concentration of the principal thermal breakdown product of generic chloramphenicol eye-drops being sold over the counter in chemists in different locations in India.

Methods: Forty-eight samples of generic chloramphenicol eye-drops were collected form Delhi and Chennai (Madras) in India. Conditions of storage of chloramphenicol eye-drops were recorded at the time of purchase. Concentrations of a hydrolytic degradation product of chloramphenicol were measured using validated high-pressure liquid chromatography. Results were compared with accepted UK standards.

Results: Significantly higher levels of chloramphenicol thermal breakdown product were found in collected samples. All samples purchased were being stored in unrefrigerated conditions in the chemists sampled. Shelf lives exceeded UK equivalents, varying considerably between manufacturers.

Conclusion: Inadequate refrigeration and prolonged shelf lives of chloramphenicol generics collected from Delhi and Chennai are associated with very high levels of chloramphenicol thermal breakdown product. These levels substantially exceed UK quality-assurance standards undermining product reliability, possibly contributing to the positive selection of resistant organisms and product toxicity effects. The principals of quality-assurance breakdown described are particularly relevant to Europe, following recent deregulation of chloramphenicol eye-drops purchased over the counter.


Competing interests: None.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.