BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 12 July 2007. doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.115121
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2008;92:669-672
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
bjo.2007.115121v1
92/5/669    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freedman, J
Right arrow Articles by Chamnongvongse, P
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freedman, J
Right arrow Articles by Chamnongvongse, P

CLINICAL SCIENCE

Supra-Tenon’s capsule placement of a single-plate Molteno implant

J Freedman, P Chamnongvongse

Department of Ophthalmology, SUNY Health Science Center at Downstate, Brooklyn, NY, USA

Correspondence to:
Professor J Freedman, Department of Ophthalmology, SUNY Health Science Center at Downstate, 161 Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA; jfreedman50{at}hotmail.com

Aim: To describe clinical results of a new technique for inserting Molteno implants in a supra-Tenon’s capsule location.

Design: Prospective interventional case study.

Participants: 19 patients, 18 of whom had suffered previous filter or glaucoma implant failure. Seventeen had open-angle glaucoma, and two had neovascular glaucoma. Seventeen patients were black and two were Asian.

Intervention: All patients underwent supra-Tenon’s capsule placement of a single-plate Molteno implant. Goldmann applanation tensions and Snellen visual acuities were determined before the operation and at the last follow-up visit. The numbers of preoperative and postoperative adjunctive drugs were compared before and after surgery.

Main outcome measures: Success was defined as intraocular pressure <=18 mm Hg with or without anti-glaucoma drugs.

Results: Mean age was 62 years. Mean pressure before and after surgery was 31 and 16 mm Hg, respectively. Mean follow-up was 22 months (range 12–48). Vision returned to within 2 lines of preoperative vision, except in one patient who lost light perception. Surgery was regarded as a failure in four patients, including both patients with neovascular glaucoma. The difference between the median number of drugs used before (three) and after (one) the operation was significant (p<0.001). Complications were minimal, characterised by small choroidal effusions in three patients; all resolved spontaneously.

Conclusion: Supra-Tenon’s capsule placement of Molteno implants in eyes with previously failed glaucoma surgery is an effective method for controlling intraocular pressure.


Competing interests: None.

Ethics approval: Ethics approval was obtained.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.