This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: bjo.2007.133561v1 92/6/757    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Odergren, A Articles by Kvanta, A PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Odergren, A Articles by Kvanta, A Topic Collections Related Article

A prospective randomised study on low-dose transpupillary thermotherapy versus photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Vitreoretinal Department, Karolinska Institutet, St Eriks Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence to:
Dr A Odergren, Vitreoretinal Department, Karolinska Institutet, St. Eriks Eye Hospital, Polhemsgatan 50, SE-11282 Stockholm, Sweden; anne.odergren{at}sankterik.se

Aim: To compare the efficacy of low-dose transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) and verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients with occult neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods: Patients were randomised to receive either low-dose TTT (136 mW/mm) (and sham PDT) (n = 52) or PDT (and sham TTT) (n = 46) with retreatment if leakage was documented by fluorescein angiography. At baseline and at every follow-up, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured with the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart, lesion size on fluorescein angiography and foveal thickness with optical coherence tomography. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients who lost <15 letters at 12 months’ follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included the proportion of patients who gained 0 letters, the change in mean lesion size and the change in foveal thickness at 12 months’ follow-up.

Results: The percent of patients losing fewer than 15 letters at 12 months was 75.0% in the TTT group and 73.9% in the PDT group (p>0.05). The percent of patients with preserved or improved BCVA was 36.5% in the TTT group versus 23.9% in the PDT group (p>0.05). The mean decrease in foveal thickness was 15% for TTT and 24% (p>0.05) for PDT-treated patients, and the mean increase in total lesion area was –0.7% and –1.1% (p>0.05), respectively.

Conclusion: In this prospective, randomised trial low-dose TTT and PDT appeared to be equally efficient at stabilising visual acuity in patients with occult neovascular AMD. Low-dose TTT may be considered as an alternative to PDT in this set of patients and also as an adjuvant to pharmacotherapy.

Ethics approval: This investigation was approved by the Local Ethics Committee at the Karolinska Institutet.

Patient consent: All patients included gave their informed consent to participate.

Related Article

At a glance

Harminder S Dua and Arun D Singh
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2008 92: 727. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]