|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Published Online First: 17 April 2008. doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.131771 British Journal of Ophthalmology 2008;92:795-799 Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Intravitreal triamcinolone versus laser photocoagulation for persistent diabetic macular oedemaZ K Ockrim1, S Sivaprasad2, S Falk2, S Roghani2, C Bunce2, Z Gregor2, P Hykin2
1 Giffnock, Glasgow, UK
Correspondence to: Aim: To determine if repeated intravitreal triamcinolone improves best corrected visual acuity at 1 year compared with conventional laser therapy for persistent diabetic macular oedema. Methods: 88 eyes with persistent clinically significant macular oedema, after at least one prior laser photocoagulation, were included in this prospective randomised controlled trial. 43 patients were randomised to 4 mg of intravitreal triamcinolone (TA) and 45 to laser photocoagulation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who improved by 15 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at 12 months in TA versus laser groups. Secondary endpoints were the change in mean best corrected visual acuity, difference in macular thickness and macular volume and adverse event reporting in particular elevated intraocular pressure at 12 months.
Results: Improvement in Conclusion: This study did not show a benefit from intravitreal triamcinolone over conventional laser therapy for patients with chronic diabetic macular oedema
Competing interests: None. Ethics approval: This prospective randomised trial was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local Research and Ethics Committees at Moorfields Eye Hospital. Patient consent: Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before details of medical and ophthalmic examinations were recorded.
Relevant Article
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |