Br J Ophthalmol. Published Online First: 11 April 2008. doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.126417
Original article - Clinical Science |
Is the maximum hypermetropic correction necessary in children with fully accommodative esotropia?
1 Ninewells Hospital, United Kingdom
2 NHS Fife, United Kingdom
3 Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, United Kingdom
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: c.j.macewen{at}dundee.ac.uk.
Accepted 5 March 2008
Abstract
This prospective study explores the effect of reduction in hypermetropic refractive correction on the angle and control of fully accommodative esotropia.
Methods 30 childhood cases with fully accommodative esotropia were recruited. The angle of deviation with and without full hypermetropic correction (near and distance) was measured. The overall effect of reduction of the correction by one and two spherical dioptres (DS) on the angle and control of the deviation was identified.
Results With the full hypermetropic correction in place the angle of deviation for near was less than 10 prism dioptres (pd) in 73% of the participants and the distance deviation was less than 10pd in 93%. When the prescription was reduced by 1.00DS the percentage of those with a near deviation of less than 10pd fell to 30% and 57% for the distance. Twenty percent immediately decompensated to manifest esotropia with reduction of 1 dioptre of spectacle correction.
Conclusion Children with fully accommodative esotropia who are given the full hypermetropic correction demonstrate smaller, more controllable angles of deviation than those who are undercorrected by as little as only one dioptre. This supports the practice of providing the maximum hypermetropic correction for childhood esotropes.
Relevant Article
- Full or partial hypermetropic correction for accommodative esotropia: does it matter?
- Ken K Nischal
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2008 92: 1303.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Nischal, K. K
(2008). Full or partial hypermetropic correction for accommodative esotropia: does it matter?. Br. J. Ophthalmol.
92: 1303-1303
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
