BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 June 2008

Br J Ophthalmol. Published Online First: 20 March 2008. doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.128561
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
bjo.2007.128561v1
92/6/775    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, F. K
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, F. K

Original article - Clinical Science

Visual Acuity Measurement and Ocular Co-Morbidity in Diabetic Retinopathy Screening

Peter Henry Scanlon 1*, Chris Foy 2 and Fred K Chen 2

1 Cheltenham General Hospital, United Kingdom
2 Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: peter{at}p5sca.demon.co.uk.

Accepted 2 February 2008


*  Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the relationship between best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), age, type of diabetes, sight threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) and ocular co-morbidity.

Methods: 1,549 randomly selected people with diabetes mellitus (DM) from a county-wide digital photographic screening programme had standardised logMAR BCVA measurement, followed by slit lamp biomicroscopy examination by an experienced ophthalmologist.

Results: Subnormal vision (logMAR ≥ 0.3, Snellen ≤ 6/12) and blindness (logMAR > 1.3, Snellen < 3/60) in the better-seeing eye were found in 9.0% and 0.45%. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of using subnormal vision to screen for STDR in an individual eye was 33.4%, 85.9%, 18.6% and 93.0% respectively. Important contributory causes of moderate visual loss (LogMAR 0.50 to 0.98, Snellen 6/18 or worse but better than 6/60) and of Acuity Blindness (LogMar ≥ 1.0, Snellen 6/60 or worse) in an individual eye were lenticular opacity (including capsular opacification) 49%, macular degeneration (including myopic degeneration) 29%, diabetic maculopathy 15%, other media causes (including corneal opacity) 13% and amblyopia 10%.

Conclusion: The majority of visual loss in a population with diabetes is due to causes other than DR. BCVA alone is not a reliable criterion in predicting STDR.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.