BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 July 2008

Br J Ophthalmol. Published Online First: 6 May 2008. doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.131037
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
bjo.2007.131037v1
92/7/916    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, J. H
Right arrow Articles by Lightman, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, J. H
Right arrow Articles by Lightman, S.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Original article - Clinical Science

Use of ocular hypotensive prostaglandin analogues in patients with uveitis: Does their use increase anterior uveitis and cystoid macular oedema?

John H Chang 1, Peter McCluskey 2*, Tom Missotten 3, Paolo Ferrante 3, Bin Jalaludin 2 and Susan Lightman 3

1 Department of Ophthalmology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia, Australia
2 Department of Ophthalmology Liverpool Hospital, Australia
3 Moorfields Eye Hospital, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: peter.mccluskey2{at}sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

Accepted 9 April 2008


*  Abstract

Aim: A retrospective comparative case series was studied to determine whether the use of prostaglandin (PG) analogues to treat raised intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with uveitis resulted in an increase in the frequency of anterior uveitis or CME.

Methods: 163 eyes of 84 consecutive patients with uveitis and raised IOP treated with a PG analogue at two tertiary referral uveitis clinics were identified over a 3-month period. Control eyes were selected as those uveitic eyes of the same patients, which were treated with topical IOP-lowering agent(s) other than a PG analogue. Pre-treatment IOP was compared to the mean IOP during PG analogue treatment. The frequency of anterior uveitis and CME during PG analogue treatment was compared to the frequency of these complications in the control eyes during non-PG IOP-lowering treatment.

Results: Significant IOP reductions were observed during PG analogue treatment. There was no significant difference in the frequency of anterior uveitis in those eyes treated with PG analogues and those treated with non-PG agents (P=0.87, Fisher's exact test). None of the 69 uveitic eyes without a previous history of CME developed this complication. There was no increase in the frequency of visually significant CME during PG treatment compared to that during non-PG treatment (P=0.19, Fisher's exact test).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that PG analogues are potent topical medications for lowering raised IOP in patients with uveitis and are not associated with increased risk of CME or anterior uveitis.



Related Article

At a glance
Harminder S Dua and Arun D Singh
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2008 92: 869. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.