BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 June 2008

Br J Ophthalmol. Published Online First: 17 April 2008. doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.131078
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
bjo.2007.131078v1
92/6/788    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cervino, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hosking, S. L
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cervino, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hosking, S. L

Original article - Clinical Science

Performance of the Compensation Comparison Method for Retinal Straylight Measurement. Effect of Patient's Age on Repeatability

Alejandro Cervino 1*, Robert Montes-Mico 1 and Sarah L Hosking 2

1 University of Valencia, Spain
2 City University, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: alejandro.cervino{at}uv.es.

Accepted 6 February 2008


*  Abstract

Purpose: The assessment of repeatability and reproducibility of retinal straylight measurements with the C-Quant straylight meter (Oculus AG, Germany) and the effect of patient's age on the instrument performance are tested with a series of experiments.

Methods: First, 20 eyes of 20 subjects (mean age 26.9±2.7 years, mean refractive error -1.34±2.72 D) were examined with the C-Quant straylightmeter, taking 10 consecutive readings. Five subjects were also examined on 5 consecutive days to assess reproducibility. Additionally, repeated measures of straylight from 84 subjects of ages ranging from 19 to 86 years (mean±SD: 42.4±24.0 years) were retrospectively analysed to assess the effect of patient's age on repeatability.

Results: The results failed to show significant differences between the readings taken within the same session (mean SD 0.07, p>0.05) or between sessions (mean SD 0.05, p>0.05). Variability of intrasession measurements was not significant for subjects of different age (p=0.094).

Conclusion: It may be concluded then that the C-Quant straylightmeter is repeatable and reliable for the assessment of retinal straylight in human eyes. Age of the patient does not decrease repeatability even though they feel more insecure about their ability to perform the test








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.