BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 June 2008

Br J Ophthalmol. Published Online First: 6 May 2008. doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.134569
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
bjo.2007.134569v1
92/6/844    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stappler, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stappler, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, D.

Original article - Laboratory Science

A Guide to the Removal of Heavy Silicone Oil

Theodor Stappler 1*, Rachel Williams 2, S.K Gibran 3, Efstathios Liazos 4 and David Wong 1

1 Royal Liverpool University Hospital, United Kingdom
2 Department of Clinical Engineering, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
3 St Paul's Eye Unit, United Kingdom
4 St Paul s Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot St., Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: theodorstappler{at}web.de.

Accepted 10 March 2008


*  Abstract

Purpose: Heavy silicone oil removal can be challenging and differs considerably from conventional oil. Traditionally, strong active aspiration had to be applied through a long 18G needle just above the optic disc. We present a novel technique using a much shorter (7.5mm) and smaller (20G) needle allowing its removal "from a distance".

Method: Active aspiration on a vacuum of 600mmHg of the "viscous fluid injector" was applied using the 20G cannula in a polymethylmethacrylate model eye chamber that was surface-modified to mimic the surface properties of the retina. Measurements were taken using still photographs.

Results: Under injection the maximum diameter of a silicone oil bubble supported by interfacial tension alone was 5mm for a steel and 7mm for a polyurethane cannula. Under suction, the silicone bubble changed shape and became conical thus further increasing the cannula’s reach. This conical shape illustrated "tubeless siphoning", which is a physical property of non-Newtonian fluids.

Discussion: The use of shorter and smaller gauge cannula for removal of Densiron obviates the need to enlarge the sclerotomy beyond 20G or to apply suction in close proximity to disc and fovea. This potentially reduces the risk of iatrogenic damage such as entry site tears or postoperative hypotony.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.