BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 June 2008

Br J Ophthalmol. Published Online First: 6 May 2008. doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.139329
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
bjo.2008.139329v1
92/6/729    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cox, J.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cox, J., BA(hons) M
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R., FRCOphth F

Review article

Efficacy of antiglaucoma fixed combination therapy versus unfixed components in reducing intraocular pressure: a systematic review

Jacqueline Cox BA(hons) M1, Susan P Mollan MBCHB MRCO1*, John Bankart BA(hons),2 and Rosemary Robinson FRCOphth F1

1 University Hospitals Coventry and Warwick NHS Trust, United Kingdom
2 Trent Research and Development Support Unit and Department of Health Sciences, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: soozmollan{at}doctors.org.uk.

Accepted 14 March 2008


*  Abstract

Aim To evaluate the efficacy of the fixed combination ocular hypotensive therapies compared to their non-fixed components used concomitantly for lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Methods A systematic review of the literature, up to May 2007, without limits on year or language of publication was performed. Seven randomised controlled trials (n=2,083 eyes) were identified. Assessment of methodological quality was made using standardised criteria. Results were pooled quantitatively using meta-analysis methods and statistical analysis was performed using STATA® software. The difference in mean intraocular pressure (mmHg) from baseline between the fixed combination and non-fixed component therapies was compared. Non-inferiority in terms of efficacy was set at an upper confidence limit of ≤1.5mmHg for all time points (hour 0, hour 2 and hour 8) and evaluated at 12 weeks. Safety was evaluated from data on adverse events as reported in the included studies.

Results Of the 679 abstracts identified, 7 randomised controlled trials met the selection criteria. The quality scores of included studies were high, (mean of 29.4, maximum score 30). The mean differences (95% CI) and p-values at 12 weeks were as follows: 0.200mmHg, (CI -0.106 to 0.507), p=0.20 for Hr0, 0.393mmHg (CI 0.038 to 0.747), p=0.03 for Hr2 and 0.501mmHg (CI 0.156 to 0.846), p = 0.004 for Hr8. Although both Hr2 and Hr8 showed statistical significance favouring the non-fixed combinations, the non-inferiority measure ≤1.5mmHg upper confidence limit was not exceeded.

Conclusions Fixed combination therapies are equally safe and effective at lowering IOP as their non-fixed components administered concomitantly.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.