Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;89:2; doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.053173
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;89:2
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

EDITORIAL

Editorial

A work out for hemianopia

G T Plant

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
G T Plant
The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK; gordon@plant.globalnet.co.uk


A rigorous study finds no evidence of improvement in homonymous visual field defects with training

Keywords: visual field defects; visual restitution training

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

At the recent meeting of the International Neuro-ophthalmology Society in Geneva one of the most interesting presentations was given by two collaborators who disagreed on the interpretation of their joint findings. The atmosphere was more than usually stimulating. The disputed results are published in this issue of BJO (p 30).

It was Josef Zihl from Munich who in 1979, with von Cramon, put forward evidence that it might be possible with practice to extend areas of residual vision in cases with homonymous visual field defects secondary to occipital damage. I have always been sceptical of these findings.

In recent years the work of Erich Kasten and Bernhard Sabel and others in Magdeburg has raised interest again in the prospect of using training methods to bring about a reduction in the extent or density of visual field defects in such patients. The method is referred to as visual restitution . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

BJO at a glance
Creig Hoyt
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005 89: 1a. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Does visual restitution training change absolute homonymous visual field defects? A fundus controlled study
J Reinhard, A Schreiber, U Schiefer, E. Kasten, B A Sabel, S Kenkel, R Vonthein, and S Trauzettel-Klosinski
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005 89: 30-35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Roth, T., Sokolov, A. N., Messias, A., Roth, P., Weller, M., Trauzettel-Klosinski, S. (2009). Comparing explorative saccade and flicker training in hemianopia: A randomized controlled study. Neurology 72: 324-331 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Firlik, A. D., Mehta, N. S., Galetta, S. L., Glisson, C. C. (2008). VISUAL REHABILITATION: NOW YOU SEE IT; NOW YOU DON'T. Neurology 70: 158-159 [Full Text]  
  • Caplan, L R, Firlik, A, Newman, N J, Pless, M, Romano, J G, Schatz, N (2005). Vision restoration therapy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 89: 1229-1229 [Full Text]  
  • Sabel, B A, Kenkel, S, Kasten, E (2005). Vision restoration therapy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 89: 522-524 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Ophthalmology Jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs