BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 14 May 2008. doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.133421
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2008;92:893-895
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
bjo.2007.133421v1
92/7/893    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jeganathan, S V
Right arrow Articles by Vajpayee, R B
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jeganathan, S V
Right arrow Articles by Vajpayee, R B
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Resuturing following penetrating keratoplasty: a retrospective analysis

S V Jeganathan1, S Ghosh1,2, V Jhanji1,2, E Lamoureux2, H R Taylor1,2, R B Vajpayee1,2

1 Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
2 Centre for Eye Research of Australia, University of Melbourne, Australia

Correspondence to:
Professor R B Vajpayee, FRANZCO, Centre for Eye Research of Australia, University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia; rasikv{at}unimelb.edu.au

Aim: To examine the clinical profile of cases requiring resuturing following penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) at a tertiary care eye hospital.

Methods: The medical records of 947 consecutive patients who had undergone PKP between 1998 and 2006 were reviewed retrospectively and cases that were resutured during this period were analysed. The main parameters studied were indications for PKP, suturing techniques, causes of resuturing, visual acuity outcome and post-resuturing complications.

Results: The incidence of resuturing was 5.4% (51 eyes). The number of cases requiring resuturing was higher in corneal grafts performed for microbial keratitis (12%) than those for keratoconus (10%) and corneal endothelial decompensation (2.5%; p = 0.08). Wound dehiscence was the leading cause for resuturing (43%), followed by loose or broken sutures (37.3%). The most common complications after resuturing were occurrence of microbial keratitis (7.8%) and graft failure (5.9%).

Discussion: Resuturing may have to be performed more commonly for corneal transplantation surgery done for microbial keratitis and keratoconus. The major indications for resuturing are wound dehiscence and loose/broken sutures.


Funding: None

Competing interests: None.


Relevant Article

Stitched up: full thickness corneal grafts
Harminder S Dua, Rakesh Jayaswal, and Dalia G Said
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2008 92: 869-870. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
H. S Dua, R. Jayaswal, and D. G Said
Stitched up: full thickness corneal grafts
Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2008; 92(7): 869 - 870.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.