BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 May 2008

Br J Ophthalmol. Published Online First: 22 February 2008. doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.130971
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
bjo.2007.130971v1
92/5/645    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hasler, P. W
Right arrow Articles by Pruente, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hasler, P. W
Right arrow Articles by Pruente, C.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

Original article - Clinical Science

Early Foveal Recovery after Macular Hole Surgery

Pascal W Hasler 1 and Christian Pruente 2*

1 Eye Clinic Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
2 Medical University Vienna, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Austria

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: christian.pruente{at}meduniwien.ac.at.

Accepted 20 January 2008


*  Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate morphologic and functional recovery after macular hole surgery using pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), inner limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, air-tamponade, and short-time limited face-down positioning.

DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional, non-comparative consecutive case series.

PATIENTS: Thirty eyes in 30 patients with unilateral full-thickness macular hole (stage II-IV).

INTERVENTION: All eyes underwent PPV, ILM peeling and fluid-air exchange followed by postoperative face-down positioning for two days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment of macular integrity, and biomicroscopy at days 3, 7 and months 1, 3, 6 and 12.

RESULTS: On postoperative day 3, OCT demonstrated macular hole closure in 28 eyes (93%). One eye required vitrectomy seven weeks after initial surgery due to retinal de-tachment.

CONCLUSIONS: In the present case series, PPV with trypan blue-assisted ILM peeling, short acting internal tamponade and thus shorter face-down positioning was associated with a 93% macular hole closure rate.



Relevant Article

At a glance
Harminder S Dua and Arun D Singh
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2008 92: 585. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.