Article Text

PDF
Rate and risk factors for the conversion of fovea-on to fovea-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment while awaiting surgery
  1. Andreas Kontos,
  2. Tom H Williamson
  1. Department of Ophthalmology, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Andreas Kontos, Department of Ophthalmology, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, UK; akontos{at}doctors.org.uk

Abstract

Background/aims Progression of a fovea-on to a fovea-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) while awaiting surgery is rare.

Methods A retrospective review of patient records to identify patients in whom a fovea-on retinal detachment at presentation was found to be fovea off at surgery.

Results We identified 10 cases over 14 years which converted from fovea-on to fovea-off RRD while awaiting surgery. This represented 1.1% of RRDs that were fovea on at presentation (n=930). Nine out of 10 patients had superotemporal RRDs extending to at least the vascular arcade at presentation and all had superotemporal breaks within detached retina, which was significantly higher than the rate for other retinal detachments (100% vs 63%, p=0.02). There were 2.4 breaks per eye, similar to other retinal detachments. Six of the 10 patients converted to a fovea-off retinal detachment within a few hours and the rest by the following day. Visual outcomes were good, with eight patients maintaining their presenting visual acuity and two losing one Snellen line.

Conclusions Offering same-day surgery to high-risk fovea-on RRDs may not significantly influence visual outcomes and would only prevent about half of the conversions to fovea off. Superotemporal retinal detachments extending to near the arcades are most at risk and might warrant posturing to limit spread of the detachment in the preoperative period.

  • Retina
  • Macula
  • Treatment Surgery
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors AK designed, collected and analysed the data and prepared the manuscript. THW designed the study, analysed the data and reviewed and edited the manuscript.

  • Competing interests THW: Bausch and Lomb Insights Panel, Software development for Axsys Technology, Glasgow, UK, and a visiting lecturer for Alcon, UK.

  • Ethics approval Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust research and development department.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.