rss
Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:686-690 doi:10.1136/bjo.81.8.686
  • Original Article
    • Laboratory science

Effect of beam variables on corneal sensitivity after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy

  1. John G Lawrensona,b,
  2. Melanie C Corbettc,
  3. David P S O’Brartc,
  4. John Marshallc
  1. aApplied Vision Research Centre, Department of Optometry and Visual Science, City University, London, bReta Lila Weston Institute of Neurological Studies, University College London Medical School, cDepartment of Ophthalmology, St Thomas’s Hospital, London
  1. Dr J G Lawrenson, Department of Optometry and Visual Science, City University, Goswell Road, London EC1V 7DD.
  • Accepted 10 April 1997

Abstract

AIM To investigate changes in corneal touch sensitivity following excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using different beam configurations.

METHODS 20 subjects were given a unilateral −3.00 D correction with either a 5 mm (26 μm, n=10) or 6 mm (42 μm, n=10) beam diameter. Thirty subjects underwent a unilateral −6.00 D correction with 5 mm (62 μm, n=10), 6 mm (78 μm, n=10), or multizone (62 μm, n=10) treatments. The multizone treatment was 6 mm in diameter with the depth of the 5 mm treatment. Corneal sensitivity was measured using a slit-lamp mounted Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer before and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after PRK. Stimulus locations included points lying within the ablated zone (central) and outside (peripheral). These were compared with the equivalent locations in control (untreated) eyes.

RESULTS There was a significant reduction in corneal sensitivity within the central (ablated) zone in all treatment groups after PRK. In most groups a return to full sensitivity was achieved by 6 months with the exception of the multizone treatment group which showed significant corneal hypoaesthesia at 12 months. Peripheral corneal sensitivity was also reduced in this group up to 3 months after the procedure. A comparison between the −3.00 D and −6.00 D treatment groups showed no significant difference. However, combining data from all treatment groups, a significant correlation was found between the interocular difference in central corneal sensitivity and postoperative haze at 3 and 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS For corrections up to −6.00 D ablation depth and treatment zone diameter do not appear to be clinically important determinants of corneal hypoaesthesia. In contrast, postoperative corneal haze appears to correlate with sensitivity loss.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.