Table 2
Median values (25th percentile–75th percentile) of the three model parameters in the study groups for each fundus location. The p values under the variable values indicate the outcome of the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA showed that only the variables Fdt and τ were significantly different among the study groups. Friedman ANOVA showed significant relations between location and variable values
| Fdtdisc | Fdtc1 | Fdt c2 | Fdt c3 | Fdtc4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 66.4 (51.0–116.8) | 58.1 (45.6–88.2) | 55.9 (41.5–77.2) | 55.0 (41.2–74.5) | 53.4 (37.8–69.2) |
| OHT | 62.2 (48.6–84.2) | 57.5 (40.3–73.2) | 56.0 (40.0–76.3) | 52.0 (34.1–67.6) | 48.3 (33.4–66.4) |
| POAG | 37.0 (28.2–54.1) | 34.5 (25.7–58.8) | 33.3 (24.2–51.9) | 29.6 (21.1–46.7) | 29.3 (21.4–45.1) |
| NPG | 48.1 (29.5–68.8) | 44.1 (27.0–65.0) | 42.1 (27.1–69.2) | 40.4 (24.7–67.0) | 40.0 (23.7–65.2) |
| p=0.0003 | p=0.024 | p=0.035 | p=0.041 | p=0.018 | |
| t0disc | t0c1 | t0 c2 | t0c3 | t0 c4 | |
| N | 14.1 (12.1–14.7) | 14.4 (12.4–15.0) | 14.6 (12.2–15.3) | 14.6 (12.4–15.3) | 14.7 (12.7–15.2) |
| OHT | 15.1 (13.7–19.0) | 15.1 (13.9–19.3) | 15.7 (14.4–19.8) | 16.3 (14.4–20.1) | 16.5 (14.1–20.1) |
| POAG | 15.1 (13.9–20.9) | 14.9 (13.2–20.6) | 15.1 (13.8–20.7) | 15.3 (13.2–20.6) | 15.4 (12.6–20.1) |
| NPG | 15.5 (14.0–19.5) | 16.1 (13.7–20.0) | 15.8 (13.5–20.2) | 16.0 (13.3–20.1) | 16.2 (12.8–20.3) |
| ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| τ disc | τ c1 | τ c2 | τ c3 | τ c4 | |
| N | 3.8 (3.3–4.4) | 4.1 (3.5–4.5) | 4.1 (3.6–4.6) | 4.2 (3.7–4.6) | 4.2 (3.8–4.8) |
| OHT | 4.1 (3.0–5.0) | 4.4 (3.4–6.3) | 4.5 (3.8–6.2) | 4.5 (3.8–6.2) | 4.5 (4.0–6.2) |
| POAG | 5.0 (4.1–6.0) | 5.5 (4.3–6.8) | 5.6 (4.4–6.7) | 5.7 (4.4–7.0) | 5.7 (4.5–7.3) |
| NPG | 6.6 (4.8–7.9) | 7.5 (5.5–9.3) | 6.9 (5.4–9.4) | 7.0 (5.5–9.4) | 7.0 (5.6–9.4) |
| p<0.0001 | p<0.0001 | p<0.0001 | p<0.0001 | p<0.0001 |
