rss
Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:762-764 doi:10.1136/bjo.81.9.762
  • Original Article
    • Clinical science

Retinopathy of prematurity screening, stress related responses, the role of nesting

  1. M Slevina,
  2. J F A Murphya,
  3. L Dalyb,
  4. M O’Keefec
  1. aDepartment of Neonatology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, bDepartment of Public Health, Medicine and Epidemiology, University College, Dublin, cDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Mater Hospital, Dublin
  1. Dr J F A Murphy, Department of Neonatology, National Maternity Hospital, Holles Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.
  • Accepted 28 May 1997

Abstract

AIMS/BACKGROUND In a prospective study the degree of distress caused by retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening in a cohort of preterm infants was assessed and the modifying effects of nesting in reducing their discomfort was evaluated.

METHODS 38 preterm infants were included in the study. 19 infants were placed in a nest with boundaries (intervention group) and 19 infants were placed on a cot blanket (control group). Observations were made 2 minutes before, throughout, and 2 minutes after ROP examination. The factors observed were crying responses, neurobehavioural activity, and physiological changes (heart rate, oxygen saturation). Recordings were made using a video camera for crying and neurobehavioural activity and an Oxypleth monitor for heart rate and oxygen saturation.

RESULTS During ROP screening, the total group of 38 infants (nested and non-nested combined) displayed increased neurobehavioural activity (p<0.01) and crying (p<0.01). The increased activity and crying coincided with the invasive part of the procedure. The distress caused by ROP screening was significantly less for the nested group compared with the non-nested group for both movement activity (p<0.01) and crying (p<0.01). The physiological data, heart rate, and oxygen saturation were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION ROP screening is distressing for preterm infants. Nesting can significantly reduce this discomfort. The findings in this study are of value in designing more optimal ROP examination schedules for infants.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.