Responses

PDF

Split thickness buccal mucous membrane grafts and β irradiation in the treatment of recurrent pterygium
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Irradiation for reccurent pterygia
    • , Eye Surgeon
    • Other Contributors:
      • Rajat Maheshwari

    Editor
    The article by Forbes et al on cheek mucosa is indeed interesting and helpful in cases of reccurent pterygia, but as they have given irradiation to cases after surgery it becomes a bias as to how much better is cheek mucosa compared with conjunctiva autograft.

    Secondly, have they considered the use of buccal mucosa for the same as cheek mucosa is more difficult to harvest although I agr...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.