rss
Br J Ophthalmol 82:362-366 doi:10.1136/bjo.82.4.362
  • Original Article
    • Clinical science

Comparison of measurements of neuroretinal rim area between confocal laser scanning tomography and planimetry of photographs

Table 2

Correlation coefficients, R, p values, and equations of linear regression lines for the correlation between neuroretinal rim area measurements and other variables

Variable Planimetry of disc photographs HRT measurements
Mean visual field defect R = −0.58; p <0.0001 R = −0.51; p <0.0001
Y = −0.06 X + 1.49 Y = −0.06 X + 1.62
Square root of the mean visual defect R = −0.64; p <0.0001 R = −0.52; p <0.0001
Y = −0.24 X + 1.58 Y = −0.21 X + 1.68
Visibility of the retinal nerve fibre layer R = 0.32; p <0.0001 R = 0.19; p = 0.01
Y = 0.02 X + 1.13 Y = 0.01 X + 1.35
“Neuroretinal rim area defect” correlated with mean visual field defect R = 0.58; p <0.0001 R = 0.52; p <0.0001
Y = 0.06 X + 0.09 Y = 0.06 X − 0.01
“Neuroretinal rim area defect” correlated with the square root of the mean visual field defect R = 0.64; p <0.0001 R = 0.52; p <0.0001
Y = 0.24 X + 0.00 Y = 0.20 X − 0.08
Rim area/disc area correlated with mean visual field defect R = −0.52; p <0.0001 R = −0.46; p <0.0001
Y = −0.02 X + 0.56 Y = −0.02 X + 0.66
Rim area/disc area correlated with the square root of the mean visual field defect R = −0.56; p <0.0001 R = −0.46; p <0.0001
Y = −0.09 X + 0.59 Y = −0.08 X + 0.69

This Article

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.