rss
Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:415-418 doi:10.1136/bjo.82.4.415
  • Original Article

A new computer program for mass screening of visual defects in preschool children

  1. D Briscoea,
  2. T Lifshitza,
  3. M Grotmanb,
  4. A Kushelevskyb,
  5. H Vardic,
  6. S Weizmanc,
  7. B Biednera
  1. aDepartment of Ophthalmology, Soroka Medical Centre, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheba, Israel, bOptitest Ofakim, Ofakim, Israel, cFaculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheba, Israel
  1. B Biedner, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, Soroka Medical Centre, PO Box 151, Beer-Sheba, Israel.
  • Accepted 5 November 1997

Abstract

AIMS To test the effectiveness of a PC computer program for detecting vision disorders which could be used by non-trained personnel, and to determine the prevalence of visual impairment in a sample population of preschool children in the city of Beer-Sheba, Israel.

METHODS 292 preschool children, aged 4–6 years, were examined in the kindergarten setting, using the computer system and “gold standard” tests. Visual acuity and stereopsis were tested and compared using Snellen type symbol charts and random dot stereograms respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and kappa test were evaluated. A computer pseudo Worth four dot test was also performed but could not be compared with the standard Worth four dot test owing to the inability of many children to count.

RESULTS Agreement between computer and gold standard tests was 83% and 97.3% for visual acuity and stereopsis respectively. The sensitivity of the computer stereogram was only 50%, but it had a specificity of 98.9%, whereas the sensitivity and specificity of the visual acuity test were 81.5% and 83% respectively. The positive predictive value of both tests was about 63%. 27.7% of children tested had a visual acuity of 6/12 or less and stereopsis was absent in 28% using standard tests. Impairment of fusion was found in 5% of children using the computer pseudo Worth four dot test.

CONCLUSIONS The computer program was found to be stimulating, rapid, and easy to perform. The wide availability of computers in schools and at home allow it to be used as an additional screening tool by non-trained personnel, such as teachers and parents, but it is not a replacement for standard testing.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.