rss

See original article: McCarty et al. 82 (4): 410.

See original article: Cleary et al. 82 (3): 225.

Revision to McCarty et al. 82 (4): 410
Revision to Cleary et al. 82 (3): 225
Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:591 doi:10.1136/bjo.82.5.591
  • Correction

Errors occurred in the article by Cleary et al that appeared in the March issue of the BJO(1998;82:225–31).

In the results section, para 3 all the degree signs (°) relating to the deviation measurement should be replaced by “prism dioptres”. Similarly, in para 4 the degree signs (°) referring to the 4 dioptre test should be replaced by “prism dioptres”.

An error occurred in the article by McCarty et al that appeared in the April issue of the BJO(1998;82:410–14).

In Table 3 the percentage of people without diabetes that have seen an ophthalmologist should be 25.4%, not 55.6%. The numbers (746/2933) are correct.

We apologise for these errors.

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.