Article Text

Successful penetrating keratoplasty in an infant after extended storage of infantile donor cornea
  1. EWA MORRIS
  1. Keratec Eye Bank, St George’s Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE
  2. St George’s Hospital, London SW17 0QT
  1. J ROB FULLER,
  2. CHAD K ROSTRON
  1. Keratec Eye Bank, St George’s Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE
  2. St George’s Hospital, London SW17 0QT
  1. Dr Rostron.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Editor,—Despite the fact that infantile corneas are such a rare and valuable material in our eye banks they are not always properly utilised.

Infantile corneas, because of their characteristics (steepness, flexibility, elasticity), are not preferred for transplantation in emmetropic adults if other tissue is available.1 On the other hand it has been suggested that for infants undergoing penetrating keratoplasty, donor and recipient age should be matched as closely as possible.2 Such age matching however is not always possible in the existing corneal storage system.

According to the United Kingdom Transplant Support Services Authority (UKTSSA) statistics, in 1996 there were 15 recipients in the 0–5 age group. Forty four infantile corneas were retrieved in the same period. Only five infantile recipients, however, received corneas from the same age group, while the other 10 received corneas from older donors, in some cases the age difference exceeded 50 years (Fig 1A). Of the available infantile corneas, apart from the five transplanted into infants, 17 were transplanted to recipients of various ages (11–40), and 22 were not used at all because they could not be allocated to suitable recipients within the required time (which for most eye banks is 4 weeks) or for other reasons such as inadequate endothelial cell density (Fig 1B).

Figure 1

Matching the ages of donors and recipients. (A) Number of corneal transplants placed into recipients aged 0–5 in 1996, by age of donors. Total 15. (B) Utilisation of corneas from donors aged 0–5 in 1996, by age of recipient. Total 44 (22 not used, and one allocated to recipient of unknown age). Data from UKTSSA.

case report

Keratec Eye Bank recently obtained donor tissue from a child aged 13 months. After 22 days in culture one cornea was transplanted into a recipient aged 5 years. For the second cornea, however, no suitable recipient could be found, either through UKTSSA or Bio Implant Services (BIS, Eurotransplant). Rather than discard the tissue after the standard 4 weeks in culture we placed it into 75 ml of fresh medium in the hope of extending the preservation period until a suitable recipient could be found.

Within a few weeks a male infant aged 3 months with bilateral Peters’ anomaly (Fig 2a,b) was referred to St George’s Hospital for penetrating keratoplasty. The left penetrating keratoplasty was carried out with the infantile cornea which, at that time, had been maintained in culture for 68 days (over 9 weeks), the final endothelial assessment, by vital staining and light microscopy, having confirmed its suitability for use. The right eye was operated on 1 week later using a cornea from a 25 year old donor as no infantile cornea was available.

Figure 2

(a) Right eye, and (b) left eye of 3 month old infant with Peters’ anomaly preoperatively. (c) Right eye 8 weeks after penetrating keratoplasty with cornea from 20 year old donor. (d) Left eye 9 weeks after penetrating keratoplasty with cornea from 13 month old donor preserved in organ culture for 9 weeks. (e) Contact specular microscopy of right eye 1 year postoperatively with cell density of 1410 cells/mm2. (f) Contact specular microscopy of left eye 1 year postoperatively with cell density of 2235 cells/mm2.

At 2 months postoperatively at examination under anaesthesia both corneal grafts were clear (Fig 2c,d). Examination under anaesthesia was repeated 1 year later. Again both grafts were clear, and specular microscopy of the graft endothelium revealed a cell density of 2235 cells/mm2 in the graft from the infantile donor, and 1410 cells/mm2 in the graft from the older donor (Fig 2e,f). Retinoscopy showed high myopia in both eyes, but both fundi appeared normal.

comment

In most eye banks organ cultured corneas that are not transplanted within 4–5 weeks of retrieval are discarded. This is based on the finding that the rate of decline of endothelial cell density increases after 35 days of culture in a single aliquot of culture medium.3

Pels et al reported that storage of corneas in culture for 3–7 weeks induced a mean cell loss of about 11% while preservation for 9–17 weeks (medium changed after 6 weeks), resulted in a mean cell loss of about 43%. The actual cell loss, however, varied significantly among examined corneas and therefore it has been suggested that the suitability of an individual cornea for transplantation should be based on the quality of the endothelium during final assessment rather than the length of storage.4 It has also been suggested that the increased cell loss after 40 days of culture might be caused by the depletion of nutrients and accumulation of waste products in the culture medium. A larger volume of medium, or the renewal of the medium, may postpone or prevent this process. However, with prolonged organ culture endothelial survival is not the only factor in determining the suitability of tissue for transplantation. If there is epithelial overgrowth onto the posterior corneal surface this can potentially lead to problems of implantation of epithelial cells into the anterior chamber.

There has been a report of corneas safely preserved in culture for 7 weeks before transplantation,5 and we have found that an infantile cornea preserved for 9 weeks in organ culture can be transplanted successfully.

There is usually no need to extend the storage time of adult corneas, but it may be appropriate to extend the preservation time of some infantile corneas in order to maximise the chance of their most appropriate utilisation, and further research is needed to optimise storage methods and evaluate the cost/benefit of longer storage times.

References

View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.