rss
Br J Ophthalmol 82:862-870 doi:10.1136/bjo.82.8.862
  • Original Article
    • Clinical science

Glaucoma and vasospasm

Table 5

Age matched comparison between focal ischaemic and senile sclerotic groups

Focal ischaemic (FI) Senile sclerotic (SS) p Value
n 22 22
Age (years) (mean (SD)) 72.7 (7.4) 75.4 (7.3) ns
Sex (n (%))
 Male 8 (36.4) 11 (50)
 Female 14 (63.6) 11 (50) ns
Hypertension (n (%)) 4 (18.2) 10 (45.4) 0.05
Ischaemic heart disease (n (%)) 0 5 (22.7) 0.02
Diabetes (n (%)) 0 3 (13.6) ns
Cerebral ischaemic disease (n (%)) 1 (4.5) 2 (9.1) ns
CVS disease score (mean (SD)) 0.27 (0.55) 1.00 (0.98) 0.004
Thyroid disease (n (%)) 2 (9.1) 5 (22.7) ns
Vasospasm (n (%)) 14 (63.6) 9 (40.9) ns
Migraine (n (%)) 5 (22.7) 2 (9.1) ns
Cold extremities (n (%)) 15 (68.2) 7 (31.8) 0.02
Vasospasm score (mean (SD)) 1.55 (0.96) 0.82 (1.00) 0.02
  • ns = no significant differences.

  • Pearson’s χ2 or Fisher’s exact test for categorical data; Student’s t-test for continuous data.

  • Hypertension was more prevalent in the senile sclerotic group in comparison with the age matched focal ischaemic group.

  • Ischaemic heart disease was more prevalent in the senile sclerotic group in comparison with the age matched focal ischaemic group.

  • The cardiovascular disease score was greater for the senile sclerotic group in comparison with the age matched focal ischaemic group.

  • Cold extremities were more common in the focal ischaemic group in comparison with the age matched senile sclerotic group.

  • The vasospasm score was greater for the focal ischaemic group in comparison with the age matched senile sclerotic group.

This Article

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.